Not sarcasm, a bit over the top, but not inaccurate. Your clip showed style and the smoke was cool. The gag at the end was very cleaver, very left field which is fun..
For a critical review, speed up the timing, good material, just a bit slow on delivery.. good name and accent thought.. very funny..
Your OTS (over the shoulder) shot would work better over the OTHER shoulder.. that way you can off set a bit more (you cant offset any more over the current shoulder because you'll hit the wall!) Doing so will help establish an "EYE LINE" between the subjects. Since we cant SEE the eyes of the main subject, having an outline of his face pointing at the guy asking the questions will help.
Im not explaining this very well.. look at this pic
Imagine the guys face blurred out.. now even with not being able to see his eyes, we could tell that he is "looking" at the woman..
And since you have the cast.. do a reverse.. where we see the face of the guy asking the question.. see these.. note the 180 deg. rule.. eye line etc..
Go here for more
http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl...mage_result&resnum=4&ct=image&ved=0CBMQ9QEwAw
The best way to do that, is to film the bit twice, first time OTS of subjet A, next time OTS of subject B. Then cut the two together as best you can. You might only use reaction shots from the interviewer (not speaking just his listening) that way, you only use the AUDIO from one of the takes..
Tighten the shot. We don't really need to see so much of the set. Get in closer (zoom in more) so that the guy asking the questions fills more of the frame but is out of focus, and only blur a small amount of the Mr. W.'s face, some detail would be good.
Lower the tripod. My general rule, contrary to the above pic, is that a camera being at the height of standing person is never the right choice. As I learn more Im sure Ill know when its right.. but most cases some other height is more cinematic.. consider the rule of thirds for framing your subject.