The Green Hornet - 4/10. In fact, just... skip it.
No redeeming qualities at all.
It's slow. There's a lot of weenie running around and some fight sequences that are okay.
I turned it off after forty minutes.
Somehow, the last half probably wasn't going to save it.
Even the director/actor/producer commentary sucks.
The last time I listened to such suck-ass dir/prod commentary was that of Predators.
Here's the b!tch of it: Even with
critic rating of 44% and a public rating of 48% this limp d!ck still banked some serious cash from moviegoers.
$120m budget (gag! cough!)
$227m WWBO
>$100m. Pretty cool cabbage for a POS.
On the other hand...
INSIDIOUS - FWIW or is 7/10, but 10/10 considering the production budget.
The annoying-as-h3ll camera angles/lenses aside, this was a pretty decent little contemporary version of Poltergeist, which I'd rate 10/10 hands down.
I wish the "Horror" genre could be relabeled the "Spook/Fright" genre.
Is anyone ever "horrified" by anything anymore, (other than winter utility bills)?
Lead's a professional thespian idiot.
Tit's are passé, apparently.
The little kid doesn't really do much.
But I'm impressed so many theater owners took this in with a
debut on April Fool's day, and no really big actors.
Did the director of Saw bring in all those moviegoers? I think maybe he did.
And what a return on that investment! Woot! That's how you do it!
$1.5m Budget (this is quite a step back down from his two previous $20m films)
$92m WWBO
That is one nice ROI.
Amazing especially considering
neither audiences nor the public particularly liked it.