... Why would you even consider shooting a movie with an I-Phone? Thats ridiculous. Maybe like a short funny video that you're throwing onto YouTube. But why must you use it for an actual movie?
You'd better shoot an email to Linkletter and tell him he's an idiot for using PixelVision.
Why would anyone manually edit their first feature on a couple of VHS decks? That Rodriguez ain't gonna go places, editing like that...
What model camera did they use for
Toy Story, btw?
_______
There are a million ways to tell a story. Motion pictures happens to be one way, and there are dozens of mediums to pick from... and even more gradations within mediums.
Why would anyone want to make a silent film, these days? After all, technology for recording sound is better than ever (in theory). Well... maybe it's just as simple as someone wanting to make a silent film, because they want to?
Maybe Rodriguez was editing like that 'cos that's all he could afford to edit on. Maybe Linkletter just thought PixelVision was friggin' awesome, purely from nostalgia or the novelty of it. Maybe Walt would spin in his cryogenic chamber... err, I mean... grave
, if he saw today's animators no longer using a brush & ink.
Are any of them less the filmmaker for using what they did?
Or did they actually have a story to present, and did so, with available (or chosen) tools & budget?