Ah... Well I do know it got interest right away... I was pulling from memory instead of looking it up. My mistake.
For screenwriters who can really EXECUTE? I do think it's only a matter of coming up with a great concept... For breaking into Hollywood that is. If you're going Indie, one can obviously do anything they want... Yet? Having said that? If I were going to be making an Indie film, I sure as hell would try to NAIL the concept down so that the story itself is KING.
Along the road of my journey in this business? I've helped more screenwriters than I can count... Many of them have obtained representation and even won competitions but none (none that I've helped) have actually sold a spec yet and my personal opinion is simply because of their concept... We've basically seen IT already.
It's even HARDER today... In fact? I have a difficult time getting screenwriters wanting to break in to the business to believe that their concept is EASILY as important (and sometimes MORE important) than the execution. You can still sell a shitty execution with a great concept... LOL. I KEEP SEEING IT HAPPEN every year.
I wrote a couple of articles about high concept for ScriptMag.com a few years back... Maybe more. As it turns out, according to ScriptMag's editor? Those two articles by far get sometimes a third to half the traffic the entire site gets even after all these years. Because of those two articles? I receive anywhere from 1 to 25 DMs in Twitter on a daily basis of screenwriters asking me to read their scripts. They want to know if their script is HIGH CONCEPT.
So instead of reading them... I just do not have the time to read all those... I ask them to just pitch me their logline.
More than half the time? I never hear back but when I do? We've seen it before. Once I tell them the truth... Sounds derivative of such and such movie and based on your logline, we've probably seen something very similar to it before? In my opinion, it would be a difficult sell.
Just today alone, I had 3 filmmakers ask me to watch their short films on YouTube. All were way too long for what the story was about. But I watched each one of them and told the filmmakers what I thought. So far? One disagreed with me and proceeded to try and sell me on WHY he was right and I was wrong.
I could very well be wrong... I like what I like. But I'm also a producer and a writer. I read professional specs all the time. Even a lot of those are SHIT in my humble opinion. Why? They are executed well but they are movies we've already seen.
I guess what I'm saying is simply this... You can even try to help someone and trust me... I try to be NICE about my critiques and I actually put quite a bit of thought into them as well but 90% of the time? All I get are arguments about WHY the choices they made about their story are good enough. They will even CONFIRM to me that what they've created is something we've already seen before by telling me it's easily as good as such and such movie... LOL. Most of the time? It's a very weak knockoff of such and such movie.
I take all of it with a grain of salt though because I think we all know that most of the people getting involved in filmmaking or screenwriting won't stick with it for the duration. Unfortunately, I have no crystal ball to know who those people are so I try to be honest and NICE as I critique their material and remember... They came to ME. I never seek them out.
My guess is that a lot of filmmakers and screenwriters feel so good about their material that they really think getting someone in the business to read or watch is going to confirm their opinion. And? I get that. I really do. But I also think I have an obligation to be honest with them. So I am. All the time HOPING they stick with it (assuming it really is what they want to DO).
So this is another long-winded reply from me simply to say... That unless there is a way to skim the cream off the top? A new website putting people together is fine and dandy but it doesn't guarantee anything except getting collaborators together.
Like @directorik said somewhere above about working on projects that MATTERED TO HIM? No matter HOW you find those projects... You're going to have to be the judge of whether the material matters to you or not. Usually? By either reading the script and or FEELING the passion of the filmmaker or writer of the material and getting inspired.
Interesting stuff really. appreciate the dialogue.
One of my favorite movies is "The Man From Nowhere" and its so fucking basic that you will roll your eyes.
Plot: Lil girl gets napped. Man kicks ass to save her.
But damn its so well made I love it
And you know you can start a commodity business and say "I'm gonna make the best damn ketchup and people will spit out heinz if you try to serve it to them after they've tasted my ketchup!" and you can be successful.
You say the key is an original concept but you also say nobody you've helped has ever made it. IDK what to make of that TBH.
I've written a bunch of plots and short screenplays in the last month. Here are a few of them.
1) If a ghost can haunt a house, a shark can haunt a pool. If you swim alone in this pool, a shark will swim over and kill you.
2) A coven of witches are attacked by a robot from outerspace
3) A 11 y.o. girls family is murdered in front of her. She becomes violent in the foster home, gets a gun from the secret safe in her parents old house, goes for revenge.
Now I think two of those are pretty original but I'm also really excited about making #3. It's just a genre film of hitgirl from kickass though.
I think the first two are original ideas.
I told my dad #2 and he said it was like cowboys vs aliens lol. Some people are such harsh critics.
This is a fantasy sci fi with witches casting magic .. not cowboys. and The aliens are machines the aren't organic.
Yet there we go i was shot down for being unoriginal.
people hear #1 and they say sharknado. i dont get it.
#1 is about making people afraid to swim in pools alone. its about instilling fear of swimming pools. not random fucking sharnados
but that is the criticism i get
What do you think