Which is exactly why there might be value in an online platform like this. Baltimore/D.C is a large area with a lot of filmmakers so it's challenging to meet the right people to help you make your stories. But the funny thing is, the right people may just be a few miles away from you. You just never realized it because maybe you didn't join the same film and writing groups that I joined like Charm City Filmmakers or worked on the same projects with the people I know.
What's even funnier is the fact that I personally know tons of very talented filmmakers who are eager to jump on a good story and are willing to do it for a reduced price or free if the story is good enough and it's not crazy complicated. A lot of these people work commercial gigs that are boring to them, which is why they go off on the weekends and make films. But these filmmakers never took the time to learn how to write so their stories need writers and they need stories to work on because, at the end of the day, most filmmakers want to get money and recognition for their creative work, which means they need content.
Obviously, money plays a big role, but not as big as you might think especially for shorts that are really really good. If you can give a filmmaker a short that's easy enough to shoot and guaranteed to place well in festivals and possibly go viral then you have all the filmmakers and resources you need to get yourself and others in the position you want to be. The only problem? You need the connections.
Indietalk is a great place to find stories and learn about writing. So is Reddit and a lot of other places. It's even better to join mastermind groups like the Charm City Filmmakers because ultimately you want to build meaningful connections. So why not have an app that can facilitate these connections?
Sure money is still a problem, particularly if you're trying to scale up, but that's why we're working on a solution that may be promising. I don't know, but at least it's worth a shot.
What I don't understand is your theoretical description of a model doesn't seem to fit the practical reality of how we're raising finance. I could be completely wrong, though, because you haven't laid it out so I'm unsure because what I'm getting is just reading between the lines. Maybe if I give you an example.
For example, at the moment in the UK, we're looking at raising finance for a short. If the short rocks, the source will likely give us enough for a feature. We're at advanced stages, the source has already given us a little money for a small, prior project which worked well and I'd say we have a 50 / 50 chance for the short. If the short works, I'd say we have an incredibly good chance of feature money. Timescale is probably by 1st August.
If we get to a feature, we will have a ready-made audience, an incredible chance of cinematic distribution and an outside possibility of an 'A' list, name actor and an OK possibility of a 'B' list actor known throughout the world. For the A-list actor, I'd say a 2% chance at best and for the 'B' list actor who can sell tickets, probably a 20% chance. Getting a known, local 'UK' actor who wouldn't be much of a ticket seller (but might sell a few, locally) would be easy in a minor role.
The elements that don't fit are:
1. Investment money always comes with strings. No-one in the universe says 'here's a load of money, do whatever you want.'
2. An A-list or B-list actor would also come with strings.
3. My 'feel' (which could be completely wrong) are that you're creating an alternative distribution platform. This simply doesn't work with our investor or any investor I know. The investors will want a return and limiting ourselves to a single platform doesn't make sense.
4. If we were limiting ourselves to a single platform, we'd need the platform to pay for our movie upfront.
5. Piracy: As soon as movies are out, if they are good, their ticket-selling or 'viewing' potential seems to be relatively short-lived because of piracy. How are you planning to deal with this?
So good luck but can you tell me, simply, how this would fit with our model of fundraising? And our model is definitely atypical!