Yup. The point is, for me, not that these people are stupid, but that we, being people, are stupid.
Most people learn, I guess in high school, how to answer the question: what is the scientific method? But it wasn't until college that the beauty and power of it really hit me, really kind of knocked me out. It was in a class on the history of cosmology, carefully designed, by a really great guy, to make just this point.
So: Aristotle had decided, BCE, that everything in the heavens traveled in perfect circles, because the circle was, well, perfect, as everything in the heavens must be. Then, I guess, Jebus said that the earth had to be the center of everything. Ptolemy, in the second century, worked it all out in an insane model of the solar system, a crazy spirograph of circles upon circles that actually worked pretty well.
Anyway, some two thousand years of dark ages later, Copernicus moved the sun to the center, and shortly after, Kepler replaced the beautiful circles with homely ellipses. And then there was light.
My point, if I have one, is that everything would be so much better if it were common knowledge that powerful methodologies do exist that can determine the likelihood of something, of anything, being true.
anyway,
(yea, I know; I'm a little sententious this evening, lol)
Most people learn, I guess in high school, how to answer the question: what is the scientific method? But it wasn't until college that the beauty and power of it really hit me, really kind of knocked me out. It was in a class on the history of cosmology, carefully designed, by a really great guy, to make just this point.
So: Aristotle had decided, BCE, that everything in the heavens traveled in perfect circles, because the circle was, well, perfect, as everything in the heavens must be. Then, I guess, Jebus said that the earth had to be the center of everything. Ptolemy, in the second century, worked it all out in an insane model of the solar system, a crazy spirograph of circles upon circles that actually worked pretty well.
Anyway, some two thousand years of dark ages later, Copernicus moved the sun to the center, and shortly after, Kepler replaced the beautiful circles with homely ellipses. And then there was light.
My point, if I have one, is that everything would be so much better if it were common knowledge that powerful methodologies do exist that can determine the likelihood of something, of anything, being true.
anyway,
(yea, I know; I'm a little sententious this evening, lol)
Last edited: