Well, I see your point, it's just that the way the AI is now, basically the faster the motion the more it screws up. Doing a live tornado or similar would be impossible right now, but I felt like I got in a few entertaining brushstrokes here and there. I can move things at normal speed, and there's some of that in there, but super high speed is kind of out of reach right now, because I have to stop every frame and tell the AI exactly what each piece of flying debri is, compared to the workflow I used for this, which was to engineer frames in the smart system, then feed those to the dumb but fully auto animator, audit the output, throw away the worst 90%, and do all the editing and mixing.Narration really soured it for me.
Talking about 300mph winds and all i get is slow motion waves
Thanks for the review, it's interesting to see how various people perceive this one, since it's purpose must seem very ambiguous out of context.Ah good. At first i was afraid this was another ecological nightmare that I was somehow unaware of, skimming by "welcome to the future," until the dude told me about the monster crabs in 2471. Whew.
Anyway, I love the colors of this, and I'm not usually that visually sensitive. And the waves are beautiful. Nice work, Mr. Pipeline!
I wouldn't say I was soured by the narration, but lines like "a theatre of tempestuous ocean waltzing to the rhythm of the wind" may be a little florid and metaphorically mixed. And maybe it's a little adjective heavy, with extraordinary effects, tumultuous ocean, cyclonic siege. And maybe, being Nate North, alliteration is your trademark but to me, there might be just a few too many.
But this is just me, and, quibbles aside, I like it. It feels high-end, production and music wise.
as it's a "mocumentary", satirizing Attenborough's work.
I do tend to have a really dry sense of humor. I'm planning to have a lot of fun with these inception tv stations. Also dream sequences. For basically everything else, I'm somewhat constrained to keep visuals within some type of SODB window, but these couple of areas are free skate.Ahhh. It makes sense now. A little dry, but in context, i think this would be apparent. Interesting. As I said, at first i thought it was something real, and then . . . I didn't want to be unkind, and so didn't go on about the writing being a little sophomoric, lol. As parody it works great, and I can see it in the tv in the tv setting as being pretty cool. I like this kind of layering of realities. I think it's a good idea, and ultimately pretty ambitious.
Just wondering, what aspect of the narration bothered you? I ask because there are 5 different things that affect the quality of narration, Content, voice, mixing, effects, timing. Can you narrow it down?Narration really soured it for me.
Talking about 300mph winds and all i get is slow motion waves
it might be a just me, niche sorta thing, especially the the slump the last six weeks has put me in, but the narration was "writing checks" that the visuals "can't cash", making me wish i could see stuff that wasn't being shown, it SOUNDED cooler than it looked, making me wish it looked cooler (disappointment)Just wondering, what aspect of the narration bothered you? I ask because there are 5 different things that affect the quality of narration, Content, voice, mixing, effects, timing. Can you narrow it down?
In this instance, I spent days refining a custom made robot voice, trying to get a more realistic tone and delivery. So basically from your comment I can't tell if you're talking about the over the top mocumentary writing, or the mix, or the voice itself, etc.