I guess it's because I see major promise and potential...but the quality is too home-grown. I don't know...more lighting design? Sound design? A better camera?........I like it so much...I wish it were better.
Hmmm, not sure what you're getting at (aside from adding gels and some shadow gobos), because I'm fairly happy with how it looks and sounds on my system. DEMON uses some pretty cool shadows and fogged shots, so I'm wondering if you could view it on another computer and tell me if it's any different? And to think, I was admiring how smooth I got the framerate on that TV movie (BLACK CRYSTAL) playback (it was not a matte).
Regardless, I will heed your comments, because there is much room for improvement and there's nothing wrong with aspiring to look more like studio quality. My camera is the Panasonic HVX200, so I'm pretty damn happy with it. My external mic is the Sennheiser ME66, which I place on a boomstand, for closeup audio. Sheila and I take turns shooting each other, so most shots are static - though DEMON had 3 pretty good handheld moments, especially her walking into the garage.
One note: The Squib demos weren't originally part of the movie and they were done as the sun was going down. (see pic of squibs and wall, above) We shot most outdoor stuff, after magic hour, when rays were almost gone. You can see one ray, on the dummy face (above). This was a case of making the movie look like the squib footage. We did not spend one dollar on it (or on DEMON), so getting those squibs in were the production value.
EDIT: A little excusing, here, but all three of these movies (including STUPID GUY, plus 2 unposted scenes) were all made for IndieMeet. Zensteve arrived on Friday and I told him to go mingle, because I was just finishing the SCREAMIN' DEMON movie!

We really cranked them out. So, yes, they could look better with time to plan.