No one here should tell any member how to spend their money. If I'm investing in someone's production with hard cash, then I should have a say. Outsiders have no idea of what a producer goes through to raise what little money they can.
This is the pain of Indie filmmaking. Why would a sane person want to go through all this?
If the "Oustsiders" are film-makers, then yes, I would believe that their suggestions are worthy, as they
all go through the very same process. GAINING the funds, and using them
accordingly. Not outsiders. This is a film forum. We are film-makers.
What I was referring to is your methodology. I can only go from your previous threads, from the links and pictures you've supplied. But I see/hear of masses of expensive props/costumes, and then I hear the actors are to be unpaid, even though the roles require secondry skills in Stunt work. Immediately, I have to think "Why wasn't this planned in the budget?"
It's
always the risk, I said it in a previous thread, If you don't pay your actors, they have no obligation to show up, or to ever contact you again. Is it right? No, infact, it's down right rude. But there are always going to be other offers, and if the alternative is a paid role, why should they not jump ship and be paid for their time?
BUDGET FOR INDIE FILMS: whatever you can raise IS the budget. You build around that and not dream of what you cannot have. If all you have is a total of $6,000, that IS the budget and you cut out what you cannot pay for.
If this is your definition of "Budget". Then you have no actors. Going purely from this sentiment. You haven't taken into account in whatever planning you did before hand, that you would need to pay your actors. Priority seems not to be with your cast.
I'm old fashioned. I'm a firm believer in "Honoring the material". Which means giving your material the
best opportunity to thrive.
Is pursuing a feature with an unpaid cast, but lavish props/costumes doing that? For me, no. I'd have factored it into the budget. It's almost certainly going to cost you more time/money resheduling when the obvious problems arise, and in this case, and many others, they drop out.
Sure, this can happen with paying roles. Ofcourse. I wouldn't for a second rule that out. But if we're playing percentages, and whether or not this is a painful view of our society. Who is more likely to stay, the paid cast, or the unpaid cast?