Nothing hasn't been officially announced, so everything not covered in the videos is pure speculation. Apple has historically been very proactive about bundling everything needed when the rest of the industry was selling separately to generate more revenue. Adobe CS is a package because they had to compete with Apple's Studio which had all of the bits necessary to have a production studio all in one package. Apple even went so far as to buy Shake from Nothing Real and roll it into Motion, and buy Color and roll that in as well... both were $5-10k applications per seat and Apple now has them as free addons. This power 15 years ago would have been $50k+ just in software licensing... Apple is acquiring the parts they're looking to add and "Applizing" (my word, I get dibs) them by keeping the power, but retooling the interface to make it easier to use/approach.
This was a demo of one part of the puzzle for a select group (Final Cut User's Group)... I'm sure they will make cool announcements about the rest of the Studio package apps and their inclusion as that has been their history. They're showing what they've got early because they're fighting off the "Apple doesn't care about the pro segment" crap that seems to have taken hold of that community. What they see is that Apple released a product that they're happy about, have moved to, then half way through the development cycle for the next release, adobe, avid or sony makes a release and suddenly Apple doesn't care anymore and should have anticipated all of the new proprietary and closely guarded stuff in those apps and had a simultaneous release with their competition.
This is precisely on schedule, a huge rewrite (which takes time) and finally pulls the aging final cut interface kicking and screaming boldly past its birth as an Adobe > then Macromedia > then Apple software package from the early 90's. I'm extremely happy they're making the interface more modern and Applizing it, as the current interface is horrendous (read: only approachable by professionals who need to keep things as difficult as possible to feel more specialized -- if you don't believe me, consider the history of so many Novell networking technicians who blatantly refused to move from IPX to TCP/IP networking to keep their positions necessary even after Novell, Inc moved to TCP/IP and encouraged all of their clients do so as well, they're still out there).
This step toward a more approachable interface will make the learning curve smaller allowing people with great senses of story, but lower technical skills to get their work made. the folks who are currently working in the industry who are mediocre, but well versed in the technology will be found out, and the folks who are well versed in the technology and great visual story tellers will be able to move from plugging in the footage to making their first shot choice and first cut much more quickly -- allowing more time for exploration on a project and less time fiddling with the tools.
The tools should get out of the way and let the craftsperson practice their craft... this is a giant leap towards that end.
<end of rant -- which invariably happens everytime I read a bunch of public response to technology announcements -- sorry>
