This is still in the "still photography" phase, but who knows where it could go in a few years?
Here are some initial links to get the ball rolling.
GigaPxl
Sample Gallery
_______
Now, the basics is this.
They use a film camera that takes a 9" x 18" film.
They are working with Adobe and Leica (a company that makes hi-res scanners) to do even better.
Each image (or frame, if you would) is scanned (or 'cined, if you would) at 4 GigaPixels. (4, 000 MegaPixels)
Each scanned frame is 24-gigs in size.
_______
Now, what does that mean?
Actually, I don't know. But I bet some of the more technically-minded people of the board have some ideas about it.
Everyone is so very excited about the DV revolution that film has been considered a lost cause, to a lot of people. Could this be a turnaround? How effective a lead would film get, even if just using half-size (or quarter-size) film in a 24fps movie camera?
Have to have pretty big film magasines, i would guess.
Anyways... the look at the Gallery resolutions is pretty neat, if you don't get anything else from this.

Here are some initial links to get the ball rolling.
GigaPxl
Sample Gallery
_______
Now, the basics is this.
They use a film camera that takes a 9" x 18" film.
They are working with Adobe and Leica (a company that makes hi-res scanners) to do even better.
Each image (or frame, if you would) is scanned (or 'cined, if you would) at 4 GigaPixels. (4, 000 MegaPixels)
Each scanned frame is 24-gigs in size.

_______
Now, what does that mean?
Actually, I don't know. But I bet some of the more technically-minded people of the board have some ideas about it.
Everyone is so very excited about the DV revolution that film has been considered a lost cause, to a lot of people. Could this be a turnaround? How effective a lead would film get, even if just using half-size (or quarter-size) film in a 24fps movie camera?
Have to have pretty big film magasines, i would guess.

Anyways... the look at the Gallery resolutions is pretty neat, if you don't get anything else from this.