Okay one last question about the blood, you said it doesn't come off of all surfaces, can i get any details?
I'm assuming carpet is a no-no
floors and walls are the main two i'm curious about.
have you ever had trouble with any of those? that's my last blood question i promise lol
Hi all,
I'm quiet a newbie to film making, so far I've only really shot 3 (what to me felt like) major projects.
Our last no budget project is in the end of its post-production. It is essentially a music video in a bit of short film like format.
Because I've done all the pre and post production, I would really apricate it if more seasoned film makers would give me a bit of feedback before it is fully finished
I hope this make sense

Thank you
Your lighitng is better than mine for sure.
I've taken the time to provide you with extensive feedback/constructive criticism, just keep in mind I am only a dog.
1st i wouldn't have shown the blood and the knife in the same frame
I would have shown the blood first, and then shown the knife in the next cut.
it's more like telling a story that way
It's awesome that you went for the full blood effect but to me it was curiously absent of any footprints - that's a lot of blood for none to end up on a shoe or get stepped on or something. It looks like you staged it, instead of acted it out and then showed us the aftermath.
2nd super super weird that this guy is digging a hole and burying a body in broad daylight? by the beach?
and then you show police lights like this guy is supposed to be worried about being caught, well he's definitely gonna get caught if he is so dumb as to bury a body in a highly attractive area in the middle of the day without any cover. these arent the actions of a worried man.
I would have bought this story more if the opening shot was a sunset, instead of a sunrise.
You could have done the rest of it day for night if you couldn't handle lighting a night scene, and then the whole thing would be more believable.
3 - directing
Without any Foley or dialogue or anything there's not a ton of room for you to direct, but i did notice a couple spots that stood out.
Mainly the way the guy was digging with the shovel didn't feel authentic. like he was more concerned about miming the shovel than moving dirt out of the ground idk. it could just have been awkward bc the shovel was so small. were there any other takes of that?
--
here is my constructive feedback as a film critic
Was that one shot inspired by casino? pretty cool.
this is just my own little shitty opinion lol but I don't like films that make the audience feel bad and then don't provide a catharsis.
If you make me feel like complete shit, and then you show me a scene where I can cry and let it all out, I will feel better after watching your film and I'll feel like i got this emotional experience and regard your movie really highly.
But if you make me feel bad and then the movie ends I just have a bad taste in my mouth.
That's sorta what you have here, a film about feeling awful and regret and then you just end instead of giving the audience a catharsis.
emotionally blueballing us.
Like i said my own little shitty opinion as a film critic but its bc i already feel bad enough in my own life every day so i don't personally seek out and enjoy films that just serve to make people feel bad.
And finally i'll end with some friendly personal advice
I think you are leaning way too heavily on your strengths as a cinematographer and not getting enough out of this project.
Taking beautiful images and overlaying music seems too easy for you.
It's definitely a story, and I'm not saying that it isn't a story, but the the way it makes me feel... it feels like i was watching a cinematographers reel you'll grow more if you challenge yourself with the other aspects of film making like directing dialogue, Foley, sound design, etc
hard to heard any criciticism i know but just trying to help you along,
and as i said your lighting is better than mine for sure