I don't mind going to the theater alone, but it takes at least an hour longer for me to see a film at a theater than it does to watch it at home, and that can be a tipping point with my schedule.
I only go to the theater to see movies that have big imagery, like action flicks, sci-fi movies, etc. I do think we're seeing some new options emerge for on-line distribution; things like Apple TV, where the movie can be sent right to your entertainment center and distributors can be reassured somewhat that their property rights will be protected.
Regarding movies showing up on the internet for free, Jijengi, where the hec have you been? Movies are available for download on the internet often before their theatrical release, and at least the day after. The easiest way to film a feature movie is to take your camcorder to the theater and film someone else's feature movie!
I don't condone piracy, but I don't think anyone can make an argument for keeping their movie off the internet, once it's released in any form. It's going to be out there, now the question is, are you going to make a profit from it?
The RIAA has been trying unsuccessfully to stem on-line music sharing. In most ways, I'm on their side, because it's their product, but I also think they're like some guy building a sand castle below the high tide line and then trying to hold back the tide to protect it.
BTW: I'm not arguing for, or against internet releases. I do understand it's a huge risk, but you can't tell me that Hollywood is too lean to take risks, and we really don't know how it might pan out. Maybe there should be a theatrical release, followed by a streaming internet release a week later, then DVD release simultaneously with a pay per download version.
I really suck at marketing, so I'm just sticking my 2 cents in here. I'd be the last one to tell someone how to market their product. I build things, I don't market them (unless I'm stuck with the job).
Doug
