I have a question, maybe a dumb one.
What if, instead of shooting the same scene and changing the camera angle each time, you shoot the scene once, (or twice if something screws up), but keep stopping the actors after every line, to change the angle. Would that work?!
Scene 22 is Bob and Mary sitting at a table - it’s three pages long.
You set up your camera and lights. A Close up of Bob.
BOB
Thank you for coming.
You cut. Then you move the camera to the other side of the table,
move all the lights and set up a close up on Mary.
MARY
I really had no choice.
You cut. Then you move the camera to the other side of the table,
move all the lights and set up a close up on Bob.
BOB
I...
You cut. Then you move the camera to the other side of the table,
move all the lights and set up a medium shot on Mary.
Mary hold up her hand.
You cut. Then you move the camera to the other side of the table,
move all the lights and set up a close up on Bob.
Bob frowns.
BOB
I was just going to say...
You cut. Then you move the camera to the other side of the table,
move all the lights and set up a close up on Mary.
MARY
Just get on with it. We have...
You cut. Then you move the camera to the other side of the table,
move all the lights and set up a medium shot on Bob.
MARY
...a lot of ground to cover.
BOB
If that's the way you want it.
You cut. Then you move the camera to the other side of the table,
move all the lights and set up a close up on Mary.
MARY
That's the way it has to be.
It takes about five minutes to move the camera and all the lights
from one side of the table to the other. For these eight shots you
have now spent 40 minutes and covered less then a quarter of the
scene. And now you have no choices in the editing room.
It seems much better to me to set the camera, shoot the entire
scene and then move the camera and shoot the entire scene.