movies What's the last film you watched? And rate it!

A Woman is a Woman - 3/10

Probably the weakest Godard films I've seen so far. It's as repetitive as it's trailer, the characters didn't pull me into the situations within the film, and the overall style doesn't match that of the masterful films of the great director. It lacks the rawness and power of his other pieces.
 
Last edited:
A Woman is a Woman - 3/10

Probably the weakest Godard films I've seen so far. It's as repetitive as it's trailer, the characters didn't pull me into the situations within the film, and the overall style doesn't match that of the masterful films of the great director. It lacks the rawness and power of his other pieces.

:(
I love this film, I found it to be hilarious and a wonderful experiment with the musical genre (it's a 'musical' without real singing and dancing). I love the staging, the rhythm of the dialogue, the situations, the colors, this is actually one of my favorite films lol. It's the film that actually got me into Godard, I had seen some of his other films and I somewhat appreciated them but didn't enjoy them, but with this one I found how wonderfully playful and intelligently crafted Godard's films are. Ah well, we all have different tastes!

A Real Young Girl directed by Catherine Breillat - 5/10
Eh, this is kind of like Kim Ki-duk's Bad Guy where I find the film to be mostly well made but I can barely tolerate the story or images, and the directing doesn't quite make up for it. I like how this film captures the feeling of being bored in the summer and youthful erotic desires, but the film ends up feeling pointless in the end. I also don't like its visual aesthetic much, nor do I think it does much with its interesting premise. I do like the music though. And there are definitely some memorable images such as the protagonist's love interest Jim, putting snakes in her vagina in one of many surrealistic dream sequences.
 
Last edited:
:(
I love this film, I found it to be hilarious and a wonderful experiment with the musical genre (it's a 'musical' without real singing and dancing). I love the staging, the rhythm of the dialogue, the situations, the colors, this is actually one of my favorite films lol. It's the film that actually got me into Godard, I had seen some of his other films and I somewhat appreciated them but didn't enjoy them, but with this one I found how wonderfully playful and intelligently crafted Godard's films are. Ah well, we all have different tastes!

It's funny, my two favorite films from him came directly before and after Une femme est use femme. Breathless and My Life to Live. Two or Three Things I Know About Her is another great film by Godard.
 
It's funny, my two favorite films from him came directly before and after Une femme est use femme. Breathless and My Life to Live. Two or Three Things I Know About Her is another great film by Godard.

Ah I see, fortunately Godard has made so many films so we can appreciate all of them. I have to catch up on Godard. I've only seen Breathless (I have to re-watch it, I saw it in my pre-cinephile days), La Chinoise, and Une Femme Est Une Femme. I've got Le Petit Soldat, Alphaville, and Pierrot Le Fou available to me, I may try to rent Breathless as I've been wanting to re-watch that one for a long time!

Guess Who's Coming To Dinner directed by Stanley Kramer - 9/10
Wow, I find this film to be extremely underrated. I saw it without any expectations except that I'd be seeing a Stanley Kramer film (I loved Inherit The Wind) and it was so good that even my brother who usually doesn't like film sat through the end and loved it. It is a very simple film, but that is its brilliance, it is pure simple drama that is good even without its commentary on racism. There is just not a single boring or awkward moment for me, it was just a beautiful film from beginning to end with wonderful performances and really good combination of cinematography/editing which I think is overlooked. There is also some nice symbolism in the film. But then after watching the film I found that many cinephiles feel this is a weak effort. I guess this will be just one of those films I'll have to defend as one of my favorites (even though honestly I feel like its greatness is very self-evident)!
 
Last edited:
Eros directed by Michelangelo Antonioni, Steven Soderbergh, and Wong Kar-Wai - 5/10
This anthology film connected by erotic themes is uneven just as many anthology films I have seen. The first short film, by Antonioni, is pretty much a waste of time. It feels like a soft porn movie without any interesting story, characters, artistry, even the cinematography and editing is not really great. The second film, by Soderbergh, is such a quirky film that I don't think it should even qualify as an 'erotic' film. It is somewhat entertaining for the most part but the ending is very mediocre. The real greatness of this film lies in the final section, directed by Wong Kar-Wai. Wong's film has many of his trademarks, wonderful cinematography by Christopher Doyle, wonderful art direction by William Chang, and a sad romantic story with distinct stylistic flourishes. Wong's film is very enjoyable and has memorable characters especially as Gong Li is in the film. It's not among Wong's best work IMO but it's still a very good 8/10 film. All in all, I'd honestly say just watch Wong's film unless you are a fan of Soderbergh, in that case watch his film too. Even the most ardent followers of Antonioni won't be missing anything if they don't watch his section, it is a real disappointment.
 
Running Out Of Time directed by Johnnie To - 8/10
In my opinion this is like Alfred Hitchcock's To Catch A Thief or John Woo's Once A Thief in the way that they are all enjoyable lesser films from a master in his prime. Running Out Of Time has the fingerprints of a master but it ultimately lacks great ideas or flawless storytelling. The story is good and fun, the comedic elements of the film make it stand out as well, and I love the performances too. But when I compare this with To's The Mission (a masterpiece released in the same year) I just can't help but feel that it's a lesser work. This is an enjoyable film for anyone into Hong Kong cinema, or anyone into good commercial cinema IMO, but it isn't among To's best work (that I've seen so far, I still have to catch up on most of it).
 
Spartacus, Stanley Kubrick
6/10
Only partially satisfying, I felt. An uneasy mixture between the clinical characters of Kubrick's later films, and heart and sympathy. The whole romance between Spartacus and Varinia was essential to the plot, but felt horribly awkward and forced the whole way through.

Still spectacular, though - the battle scenes sure communicate the weight of the Roman army, and shows the challenge that faces the slaves. And frequently beautiful sets and lighting - lovely shots throughout.
 
Schindler's List directed by Steven Spielberg - 10/10
Wow this is quite simply one of technical and artistic achievements of traditional narrative cinema. Everything from the black & white cinematography to the music to the acting to the story is simply masterful. For me, there is only one real huge flaw which is the shower scene, which is one of the most immature scenes I have ever seen as it adds unnecessary suspense to an otherwise understated story. Some may find the ending scenes to be flawed, but I don't, I found both endings (in my opinion, Schindler's departure can be viewed as one ending) to be some of the most emotionally powerful scenes I have seen in cinema. That's where the film redeems itself because I hated that shower scene so much I was going to put my score down to a 9. Now in response to a lot of criticisms especially from cinephiles and other filmmakers, of course the film is manipulative. Every film is manipulative, it is only a matter of manipulating the viewer in the appropriate manner. And I believe that here Spielberg succeeds. Look at every killing the Nazis make, none of them are intensified by drama, in fact they only last on screen for a few seconds without much consequence. Look at the way the plot unfolds, Schindler's actions are never made to look grandiose. The directing is simply a superb mix of polished Hollywood craftsmanship with a rawer edge that outlines the story. Therefore, I think that most detractors of the film simply don't like the story that is being told, or at least expected the film to represent a definitive portrait of the Holocaust as a whole. Of course with such a view there is disappointment, Spielberg simply told ONE of many Holocaust stories as honestly as he could, who can blame him for that? And also, you can't expect any film, book, or any work of art to fully encompass all of the horrors of the Holocaust, if you want something that reaches close to that then watch Claude Lanzmann's Shoah. But I believe there is a place for Shoah, for Night And Fog, and for Schindler's List as masterworks tackling one of the most difficult subjects. Although I haven't seen all of Spielberg's filmography, I believe that Schindler's List represents his greatest masterpiece (which is a great statement considering that he has made multiple masterpieces in multiple genres).

The Daughter Of The Samurai directed by Arnold Fanck and Mansaku Itami - 4/10
This is an interesting film as it is a German-Japanese production made for the war effort during World War II. It also happens to be the film that put Setsuko Hara (the famous actress in Ozu's and Naruse's films) on the map. For me the film has some great moments but it's ultimately not a good film. I'd describe this film as a Japanese film made with European sensibilities. The amount of experimentation and European visual style is quite staggering, and although these moments seem to come out of nowhere they definitely leave an impression. On the other hand there is more traditional Japanese melodrama, with one notable difference, it deals with cultural differences between Europe and Japan. Unfortunately although these two parts seem very interesting, they are very unfocused and lack vitality in the third act of the film. Any scholar of World War II propaganda films or classic Japanese films should watch the film, but it lacks cohesion which makes it ultimately fall apart. It also suffers from the foreigner-made film aspect which gives a touristy look to the country it's made in (in this case a German made a Japanese film look to touristy). It did get me thinking, I've seen lots of Japanese films but almost none feature sumo wrestling apart from this one lol. Time to dig for some sumo films to watch soon! It's unfortunate that such an interesting film falls apart in such a terrible way lol, for me films like this are tragedies :(

Manon Of The Spring directed by Claude Berri - 8/10
The second half of Claude Berri's adaptation of Marcel Pagnol's tragedy is even more brilliant than the first film. I love the emotion, the pacing, the scenes of this film, but I have similar complaints with the first film. It is just straight storytelling, and for me cinema should almost always be a little bit more. It also got me thinking, if the story was done in one 4 hour film it would be even better, maybe even a near masterpiece. Still this is a really great film with one of the most tragic stories I've seen on film. I watched both of these films in French class in less than ideal conditions (noisy classmates, mediocre projection, bad sound/low volume) so my score for these films may improve with re-watches in better conditions. For now they'll settle for scores of strong 8's. I'd say that both films together may be a near masterpiece but each individual film is just a very good film.
 
Mr. Smith Goes To Washington also has a spot in my top ten, this film confirmed my love for classic cinema! :)

What a beautiful story, with a lot of life in it, I think current cinema really needs someone like Frank Capra to make inspiring films. Have you seen Meet John Doe? That one is also really good, and it's in the public domain.

The Bell Boy directed by Fatty Arbuckle; starring Buster Keaton - 5/10
I wasn't really entertained by this film much, I love silent comedy but most of the gags here don't work and it also doesn't have any real engaging story and characters.

A Woman's Sorrows directed by Mikio Naruse - 5/10
This is possibly the second Naruse film (out of the fifteen I've seen so far) that I don't really like. The problem with the film is that it has no interesting story or characters and yet even the directing can't save the writing this time as its very mediocre for Naruse's standards. Worst of all, the film and the story doesn't really go anywhere. To be fair, the film isn't bad and the directing is even somewhat solid, but with Naruse I at least expect masterful directing even when the writing doesn't reach the same level.

I have not seen Meet John Doe. If it's anything like Mr. Smith Goes to Washington, then I have to check it out!
 
GREAT film. A bit tedious at times... but still excellent.

Yeah I've heard it is an amazing film, the definitive film on the Holocaust. I haven't seen it yet due to its length and the fact that I don't have a copy, but I'll try to watch it as soon as I can.

Budget:0 said:
I have not seen Meet John Doe. If it's anything like Mr. Smith Goes to Washington, then I have to check it out!

Yeah I think you'll love it too then, it is similar especially in the emotions that it causes in the viewer. I'd still prefer Mr. Smith Goes To Washington but I love both of them and they're both on my favorites list.

Interiors directed by Woody Allen - 9/10
I didn't expect to like this movie so much, it is essentially Woody Allen doing Ingmar Bergman, but he does a really good job. It's not a perfect film but the ending is incredibly emotional and every character and every performance is just great. The cinematography is also amazing, every composition is just gorgeous. Most importantly, I like the relationships between the characters, the family drama has always been one of my favorite genres and Allen manages to perfectly capture the relationships in this wealthy intellectual family. I wouldn't quite call it a masterpiece (maybe on later viewings I'll change my mind) but it is certainly one of my favorite Woody Allen films as I go through his filmography in chronological order.
 
Last edited:
Yeah I've heard it is an amazing film, the definitive film on the Holocaust. I haven't seen it yet due to its length and the fact that I don't have a copy, but I'll try to watch it as soon as I can.

A bit of a patience tester. I made the mistake of trying to watch it all it once. :lol:

There's nothing amazing about the execution of it, but the scope of the stories being told is large, and the stories are captivating if you can get into it, and rewarding when you finish it. And aside from the lack of recognition of involvement of certain groups and countries (you can read about that if you search 'shoah controversy', it's incredibly well done.
 
Last edited:
A bit of a patience tester. I made the mistake of trying to watch it all it once. :lol:

There's nothing amazing about the execution of it, but the scope of the stories being told is large, and the stories are captivating if you can get into it, and rewarding when you finish it. And aside from the lack of recognition of involvement of certain groups and countries (you can read about that if you search 'shoah controversy', it's incredibly well done.

Yeah that's the main reason I want to watch the film to hear all those stories on the Holocaust told so honestly. I think I'll try to watch it all at once, it will be difficult but I prefer watching movies that way.
 
Alvin And The Chipmunks: Chipwrecked directed by Mike Mitchell - 0.5/10
This is the first time I rate a film without finishing my viewing, but this has got to be the worst piece of shit I have ever seen. There are absolutely no redeemable qualities whatsoever, and yet this is the kind of movie my classmates love to watch on our last few days of school together doing nothing. Damn, I'm saddened that the cinematic medium has produced such garbage (because there is garbage with at least historical significance or garbage that is so bad that it's entertaining but this film is not entertaining at all). Give me Ed Wood, give me Santa Claus Conquers The Martians, give me North Korean propaganda, give me even Santa And The Ice Cream Bunny before making me watch this garbage or anything like it. It's incredible how such a series got three installments!
 
Alvin And The Chipmunks: Chipwrecked directed by Mike Mitchell - 0.5/10
This is the first time I rate a film without finishing my viewing, but this has got to be the worst piece of shit I have ever seen. There are absolutely no redeemable qualities whatsoever, and yet this is the kind of movie my classmates love to watch on our last few days of school together doing nothing. Damn, I'm saddened that the cinematic medium has produced such garbage (because there is garbage with at least historical significance or garbage that is so bad that it's entertaining but this film is not entertaining at all). Give me Ed Wood, give me Santa Claus Conquers The Martians, give me North Korean propaganda, give me even Santa And The Ice Cream Bunny before making me watch this garbage or anything like it. It's incredible how such a series got three installments!

Really? I thought it was an interesting exploration of the qualities of American contemporary cinema. Opening with unique credits, what follows is a dazzlingly surreal array of sequences with the sole intention of sparking political discussion and skepticism amongst it's audience for that of a more intelligent and intellectual society. The visual effects have an interested style, taking various visual elements from it's predecessors, but adding in an interesting twist with hints of Disney, McKimson, and Iwerks. The sound design is spectacular, ignoring the mainstream boundaries and unnecessary limitations and restrictions that Hollywood sets for it's films. Modern experimentation at it's finest. And as far as the cinematography goes, it's fairly ambitious, almost to a fault. Ozu and Bergman have their framing techniques often used, the surrealistic vibe of Fellini and Lynch looms in the background, and techniques of Zsigmond, Kuras, and Deakins used truly make this stunning film come alive. The minimalistic ending, and the elements of absurdism that slowly fade away as the credits role give a sense of melancholia and hopelessness, as we find ourselves roaming for answers about the true meaning of the film, and of life.

The film plays off the themes of an earlier work of the director, Deuce Bigalow: Male Gigolo. While Male Gigolo is the inferior film, it does show the development of his style. Deuce Bigalow: Male Gigolo is a visual esoteric essay dealing with the existential crisis of a man. The pretension of our main character that is lost in the increasingly nihilistic world resembles that of Nietzsche's The Gay Science, the transitional moments between each act serving as the poetry within his book. These philosophical ideas are brought to a more modern audience with it's elements of superficial eroticism and ludicrousness. These ideas have been expanded upon and throughly dissected and reassembled in films such as Larry the Cable Guy films, Norbit, and Speedracer. In addition to those films, Deuce Bigalow: Male Gigolo also inspired the quick witted nature of the savage social commentary "Miracles", by the experimental art-rock group, Insane Clown Posse.

You have to study up on your cinema, buddy.
 
A bit of a boring reply this but Godzilla (2014) and I'd give it a biased 7/10.

Growing up my grandparents used to let me watch Godzilla on TV so I love Godzilla! This ticked most if the boxes for me but I still left the cinema thinking there needed to be something more...don't know what. Was an enjoyable film though and I didn't think it dragged at any point. Godzilla resembled the king of the monsters from old, unlike the previous Hollywood Godzilla (which was alright too by me but not a Godzilla movie).

Not going to spoil it for anyone eho hasn't seen it but there few a few cheesey bits but they weren't that bad and I had a chuckle at the Mothra reference.

Overall, worth my money and I look forward to a sequal (if they make one) hopefully with Gareth Edwards at the helm.
 
Really? I thought it was an interesting exploration of the qualities of American contemporary cinema. Opening with unique credits, what follows is a dazzlingly surreal array of sequences with the sole intention of sparking political discussion and skepticism amongst it's audience for that of a more intelligent and intellectual society. The visual effects have an interested style, taking various visual elements from it's predecessors, but adding in an interesting twist with hints of Disney, McKimson, and Iwerks. The sound design is spectacular, ignoring the mainstream boundaries and unnecessary limitations and restrictions that Hollywood sets for it's films. Modern experimentation at it's finest. And as far as the cinematography goes, it's fairly ambitious, almost to a fault. Ozu and Bergman have their framing techniques often used, the surrealistic vibe of Fellini and Lynch looms in the background, and techniques of Zsigmond, Kuras, and Deakins used truly make this stunning film come alive. The minimalistic ending, and the elements of absurdism that slowly fade away as the credits role give a sense of melancholia and hopelessness, as we find ourselves roaming for answers about the true meaning of the film, and of life.

The film plays off the themes of an earlier work of the director, Deuce Bigalow: Male Gigolo. While Male Gigolo is the inferior film, it does show the development of his style. Deuce Bigalow: Male Gigolo is a visual esoteric essay dealing with the existential crisis of a man. The pretension of our main character that is lost in the increasingly nihilistic world resembles that of Nietzsche's The Gay Science, the transitional moments between each act serving as the poetry within his book. These philosophical ideas are brought to a more modern audience with it's elements of superficial eroticism and ludicrousness. These ideas have been expanded upon and throughly dissected and reassembled in films such as Larry the Cable Guy films, Norbit, and Speedracer. In addition to those films, Deuce Bigalow: Male Gigolo also inspired the quick witted nature of the savage social commentary "Miracles", by the experimental art-rock group, Insane Clown Posse.

You have to study up on your cinema, buddy.

:lol:

LOL thanks for making me laugh so much today! Now I find a redeemable quality to the film, it inspired you to write this lol.

If you were serious, then the film must have gotten damn good after the first 40 minutes or so lol. But I'd argue that Deuce Bigalow: Male Gigolo is still Mitchell's masterpiece, it simply does so much more with less and is more subtle in the execution of its ideas. Besides Rob Schneider gives a performance that not only is as masterful as any performance by Marlon Brando or Robert De Niro but also recalls some of the elements of early Hollywood stars such as Jimmy Stewart. And obviously Schneider is the far superior comedian to Chaplin, Keaton, or Lloyd, quite simply the comedy in the film has so much depth in that it actually communicates more Sartreian philosophical ideas (I disagree with your assessment comparing it to The Gay Science). Furthermore, the film analyzes some of the ideals of Althusserian Marxism while making a strong case against solipsist worldviews (not to mention its great feminist message).

For this reason, I find that while you make a great case for Alvin And The Chipmunks: Chipwrecked (a film that I now must re-watch and reassess), Deuce Bigalow: Male Gigolo is still the superior film as it demonstrates more subtle mastery in the vein of Kenji Mizoguchi (look at the use of elaborate staging that not only advances narrative but also serves as symbolism appealing to metaphysics), it also does not need special effects to appeal to a wide audience, and finally it is not based on any source material. Mitchell, along with the screenwriters create a completely new vivid world with their film with brilliant original characters, this is what cinema is all about. Therefore, I claim that not only as Mike Mitchell one of the great auteurs of cinema (indeed he is no vulgar auteur like a Justin Lin) but that his masterpiece is among the greatest works of cinema rivaling Citizen Kane, Vertigo, The Rules Of The Game, and Tokyo Story. I only regret that Andre Bazin was not alive to appreciate the works of a true master, one that surpasses William A. Wellman, Orson Welles, Kenji Mizoguchi, Alfred Hitchcock, and Robert Bresson. I can only hope that a heaven exists that screens Mike Mitchell's films for brilliant critics and cinephiles that have been denied of the pleasure of watching these films as they did not live long enough to see them.

Thank you for giving me a more proper view of Alvin And The Chipmunks: Chipwrecked's place in the cinematic canon, I found it to be a disappointment in comparison to Mitchell's other films but I now realize that it deserves another look (some films just deserve multiple viewings to be fully appreciated). :)
 
Our Hospitality directed by John G. Blystone and Buster Keaton - 8/10
This film is very uneven, it has signs of genius but it suffers from many weak parts (and unfortunately all of the weak parts are at the beginning so they may turn off even an interested viewer). The first 27 minutes or so are very very mediocre, it isn't bad filmmaking really just very uninteresting cinema (it takes 27 minutes to tell parts that could've been told in 5 minutes). However, after that it is just brilliant silent comedy, after those first 27 minutes it gets better and better into an incredible climax. If the beginning were better then I'd give the film a 9/10 or even a 10/10, but as it is it suffers from an unusually unentertaining beginning. I can see why sfoster might have gotten desperate with this one and ended up disliking it, to be honest during those 27 minutes I even considered giving this film much less than an 8 but I stuck through and loved what I saw. It wasn't that the beginning was just slow (I love tons of slow cinema) it's just that the first 27 minutes are uninteresting mediocrity, backstory that could've been told in a much shorter amount of time. The rest is just Buster Keaton at his best doing what he does best (so if you love Keaton you'll love it, if you don't, then of course you won't). The filmmaking is of course superb throughout, it's incredible to see how the cinematography and editing is great in these early Keaton films, I think he was really onto something before anyone else in his genre.
 
Last edited:
Tokyo-ga directed by Wim Wenders - 7/10
This is a fine documentary on Tokyo and a good tribute to Ozu. I was kind of disappointed to see that it isn't as Ozu related as I had hoped but the parts that are directly about Ozu are incredible. The other parts are good too but nothing special.

The Downfall Of Osen directed by Kenji Mizoguchi - 5/10
Eh, I didn't really get this movie. I loved the compositions, the moving camera, and the experimentation with visuals and editing but the film just wasn't very engaging. I found the story to be a bit of a weaker rehash of Mizoguchi's The Water Magician (an early masterpiece in his filmography) and its told in such a confusing manner. What really hurts this film is the lack of any interesting characters which made me not care about how artistically directed the film was. I will re-watch this some time as some of the experimental aspects of the film (a complex flashback within a flashback and superimposed images) confused me. This is an interesting film but I didn't find it to be very enjoyable.
 
Hesher - 8/10

Great cast. The movie was written well. Does kinda tug at you because you can relate to the family and their struggles with a huge loss.
 
Back
Top