Pete, , yeah...
I liked it more than you did.
*****
Total Recall (2012).
It's not too bad. I don’t mean to "knock" a film like this when it's clear enough that a lot of money was spent on it (138 million - IMDb. You can see the money on the screen, I think.), people worked hard on it, the talent are all good, it has nice art direction, nice set design, it has admirable CGI that's mixed well with the live action elements, etc.
What's probably lacking is character development...even story development. I was a little surprised to find that this 2012 version is actually five minutes longer than the original 1990 adaptation. I had been thinking that perhaps a shorter running time might help to explain this difference. But no. It's longer.
I guess what it comes down to is that TR 2012 has a number of quite long, complicated, and time-consuming action sequences, while, comparatively, TR 1990 has a lot less action, in point of fact. Which feels weird to say, since I would have previously said that TR 1990 is an action-packed film. Well, now...maybe not so much so when compared to TR 2012. TR 1990 spends more time on such things as the mystery of who Kuato is and the discovery of the secret Mars technology that could liberate the 99 percent, so to speak, etc. While TR 2012 is more about spectacular action sequences.
I missed Mars. I think this film needed Mars.
I missed Arnold. I like Colin Farrell. His work in this film is fine and I'm happy for him getting the work etc. But I agree with Roger Ebert. Arnold brought something to this role that I missed in this "re-imagining."
So, this is a re-make that really didn't need to be made. But it's a decent enough popcorn action flick.
Maybe (a 5 or) a 6 out of 10. Production value is high. But the above mentioned feeling it gave me of rather shallow story development (not the worst sin in the world of summer blockbuster movies) must, I think, keep the score lower. Of course that's partly due to the inevitable comparisons to the 1990 version, which feels like it has more story (a more satisfying amount of it, anyway).
I liked it more than you did.
*****
Total Recall (2012).
It's not too bad. I don’t mean to "knock" a film like this when it's clear enough that a lot of money was spent on it (138 million - IMDb. You can see the money on the screen, I think.), people worked hard on it, the talent are all good, it has nice art direction, nice set design, it has admirable CGI that's mixed well with the live action elements, etc.
What's probably lacking is character development...even story development. I was a little surprised to find that this 2012 version is actually five minutes longer than the original 1990 adaptation. I had been thinking that perhaps a shorter running time might help to explain this difference. But no. It's longer.
I guess what it comes down to is that TR 2012 has a number of quite long, complicated, and time-consuming action sequences, while, comparatively, TR 1990 has a lot less action, in point of fact. Which feels weird to say, since I would have previously said that TR 1990 is an action-packed film. Well, now...maybe not so much so when compared to TR 2012. TR 1990 spends more time on such things as the mystery of who Kuato is and the discovery of the secret Mars technology that could liberate the 99 percent, so to speak, etc. While TR 2012 is more about spectacular action sequences.
I missed Mars. I think this film needed Mars.
I missed Arnold. I like Colin Farrell. His work in this film is fine and I'm happy for him getting the work etc. But I agree with Roger Ebert. Arnold brought something to this role that I missed in this "re-imagining."
So, this is a re-make that really didn't need to be made. But it's a decent enough popcorn action flick.
Maybe (a 5 or) a 6 out of 10. Production value is high. But the above mentioned feeling it gave me of rather shallow story development (not the worst sin in the world of summer blockbuster movies) must, I think, keep the score lower. Of course that's partly due to the inevitable comparisons to the 1990 version, which feels like it has more story (a more satisfying amount of it, anyway).
Last edited: