Currently the jocks seem to be getting more than their fair share of the action, Re. Tiger Woods et al.
However, I see plenty of fat ugly moms and dads at the school PTA meetings which reinforces that there's a practical someone for everyone and personality goes a long way. Like that pig Arnold on Green Acres.
But there is a gradual reproductive economy shift taking place as women are recognizing economic stability provides an increasingly better opportunity for their offspring to thrive.
Eventually some dumba$$ male, thinking with his pocketbook, is going to invent not only a DNA buffet screen giving rise to the whole GATTACA scenario - but - he'll also figure out a way for ex-vitro gestation.
Males will cease to have any practical purpose.
Susan and Jane are free to swap DNA.
In fact, that whole in vitro system is nothing but an insurance hassle. The male's, too.
How about the insurance consortium just stop covering risky organs and genders?
Risk adverse Susan & Jane, who love their children, will elect to not burden them with frightful liabilities by tailoring their "offspring" without superfluous reproductive organs which serve no purpose anyway now that we have reliable techual reproduction.
The result will look like females but without all the disgusting bleeding and hormone fluctuations and menopause and violent behaviors associated with males.
Vestigial ghosts and cultural remnants of our former selves will be engineered out.
You won't be able to recognize a post-human being in 10,000 years.
In 100,000 years? Pfft. What people are today will be the developmental equivalent to a marmoset.