It is unlikely that they are so easy to give money, even if the project is interesting. In the words of Nate North, there is a law of jungle. So I want to know what the same way I can convince them.
For a feature is even more unlikely to convince them...
Investing in a film production is a no no for a smart businessman, as I lived to find out, unless he's a film buff and he gets discount on the tax he's paying..
I would disagree. It's much easier to get an angel investor for a feature than a short because there are actually platforms for features to break out, whereas even the best, Oscar winning shorts only get seen by a handful of people who already have an interest in the business.
If you're going to use this project as a professional calling card you should probably try and self fund it first. If all else fails then crowdfunding might be your best bet but this is not to be undertaken lightly. You need to provide people with a reason why they should invest their money when you aren't investing yours.
I understand that. Maybe you can tell what benefit can be provided to sponsors.
I would disagree. It's much easier to get an angel investor for a feature than a short because there are actually platforms for features to break out, whereas even the best, Oscar winning shorts only get seen by a handful of people who already have an interest in the business.
I disagree too.. Have you ever spoken to a billionaire to invest in your movie project?
They're not interested in investing a lot of money, but If they like you, they might throw a few coins (enough to shoot your short that is)
That's what I meant.
I've spoken to millionaires, not billionaires.
Your millionaires must have been from the US