As long as it's not a multiplex, I'll be there. Give me a smoke filled cinema with the secret society of wine-drinkers on the back-row. I know of one still standing, pretty sad.
Yes! If those PC folks didn't take smoking away from all the public places, I would go out a lot more. I've been to a bar twice since they banned smoking 3 years ago.
I personally hate getting up during a movie (if I'm not at home and can't pause it).
Popcorn runs out? Too bad.
Gotta pee? Sorry, shouldn't buy the pop.
Need a cigarette? No way, that would take way too much time.
So instead, I sit through the film, distracted from my cravings by the entertainment before me, only to find that after an hour or hour and a half, I've started to get impatient for the end, no matter how good the movie.
eCigarettes have saved my movie-going experience, even if people do glare at me like it's real smoke.
I really hate that the government thinks it has the right to put restrictions on where I can enjoy my LEGAL habit. After all, these businesses are privately owned, shouldn't it be up to the individual proprietor to decide whether or not to allow a completely legal activity? I think so. We smokers also pay more taxes and have had more tax increases than any other demographic (in Chicago, at least, unless you count car owners and the insane parking traps), you would think we should get
special privileges instead of being shunted outside like second-class citizens.
</rant>
Sorry. In conclusion, that is why I don't go to the theater much (only once every month or two).