As a software/IT man, I should explain how IT works. There are differences between IT and film. In IT, the work is more easily measured, and that's less about quality of code, but the testing. We know what should be done, of course, it can change among the way, because we didn't estimate some things. Additionally, in choosing software, there are two types. Those pieces of software known as Components are written by some experts and others using them if needed. It is a kind of collaboration. Usually, department of sales differs from technical, so, we only focus on doing what even others can understand, because it is measurable.
I think in film it differs. Expensive Movies are harder to direct, and harder to make, as they need more money. And those films differ in one thing from cheaper movies, more people thought about it and so it can be repetitive more probably. Also, in Hollywood, film makers want to use success formula again, and so copy. Another thing is that fashion is often repeated thing, and some times, just different.
Smaller films can be made of an idea of a film maker that is thought by him to be good. The bigger films are more than that in my idea...
Usually films which are less big mean expertise in films and bigger ones mean love by audiences. But I am totally unaware of smaller films, because I didn't watch them, unlike those who watched these movies a lot.
And a question: Is it really easier for a writer to expect his smaller project be made easier because it needs less budget and more people can do it. How to decide about plots of such movies? Because they are harder to decide if win. Also, is it possible to find a director of such movie before writing in Hollywood?
I liked China's cinema, too, and can write them, but found no one and think it is hell hard to find big ones in China, too...
Thanks!
I think in film it differs. Expensive Movies are harder to direct, and harder to make, as they need more money. And those films differ in one thing from cheaper movies, more people thought about it and so it can be repetitive more probably. Also, in Hollywood, film makers want to use success formula again, and so copy. Another thing is that fashion is often repeated thing, and some times, just different.
Smaller films can be made of an idea of a film maker that is thought by him to be good. The bigger films are more than that in my idea...
Usually films which are less big mean expertise in films and bigger ones mean love by audiences. But I am totally unaware of smaller films, because I didn't watch them, unlike those who watched these movies a lot.
And a question: Is it really easier for a writer to expect his smaller project be made easier because it needs less budget and more people can do it. How to decide about plots of such movies? Because they are harder to decide if win. Also, is it possible to find a director of such movie before writing in Hollywood?
I liked China's cinema, too, and can write them, but found no one and think it is hell hard to find big ones in China, too...
Thanks!