Looks like he ate her to me? ...I guess one man's "Eating a girl" is another man's "Traditional Romance"?
That's the third film, not the first. The first film did have some elements of romance in them. There was love between Frank and Julia. Strange circumstances and setting, but without the aspect of love, it would be a whole other film. If you took out that aspect, then well, the film would be Frank running from authorities or up the attic never discovered because Julia either got scared and ran away or Julia was killed earlier. Like I stated in an earlier post, what traditional love is, is well, debatable. In films like
Harry Met Sally, their love developed over a LONG time span. I've seen other films where it's love at first sight. So, which one of those are "traditional". Years and years or minutes and minutes? If the argument is made that it can be both, than that is my answer to you. Love can be in all genres. Love doesn't necessarily have to be for a human. Love can be for a desired state of being, or perhaps goal (if we want to take a dark turn) such as killing something. Sure, perhaps they are untraditional settings, but are they untraditional love stories. Pinhead loves inflicting pain upon others. Frank loves Julia even though one of them cannot be revealed. I can't see how we can just write it off as one thing. Movies can have different elements. Different themes. Different and conflicting ideas and tones and concepts. Love is the driving force for pretty much anything. With a murder, it may be the desire for a state of happiness by killing a character. Or it could be well, insanity and the killer somehow things that they are accomplishing some sort of goal or reach happiness - something they love. I'm not saying this is always the case, but very often love is a driving force for most. But what is traditional is debatable. Again, what is more traditional: a love that develops over years or minutes?
Okay, look. None of these movies have anything to do with "Traditional Romance" no matter how much spin is placed on a scene. "Hellraiser III" is a horror flick. "Planet of the Apes" is a SciFi. "Dirty Harry" is a police drama.
Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind is a drama/romance/science fiction/comedy film.
The Dark Knight is a drama/superhero/action/thriller film.
Pulp Fiction is a crime/action/drama/comedy film.
____ ____ is a drama/romance/action/thriller/dark comedy film.
Pan's Labyrinth is a fantasy/horror/drama film.
The Truman Show is a romance/comedy/drama/science fiction film.
The Graduate is a drama/romance/dark comedy film.
Rocky is a romance/drama/sports film.
Twelve Monkeys is a drama/science fiction/thriller/dark comedy film.
A Beautiful Mind is a drama/romance/thriller film.
There Will Be Blood is a drama/thriller/dark comedy.
These are all examples of films with mixed genres. All of them critically acclaimed and most classics. They have have different major genre elements that make them the films that they are. Most of them have romance elements.
Eternal Sunshine,
The Truman Show,
The Graduate,
Rocky and
A Beautiful Mind are obviously romances. Although They all had either elements of science fiction, comedy, or dark comedy. They aren't one thing. 12 Monkeys had a romance subplot if I remember correctly, between the woman and Bruce Willis. Another example (another Gilliam film) would be
Brazil. There was a strong romantic subplot that drove the story in another direction and completely changed the tone of the entire motion picture.
____ ____ is a romance in some sorts. _____ and ___ ________ are in ____, aren't they? That was a major part of the story, wasn't it. Sorry, I would put the name of the film, but there's a certain first rule about not talking about it.
I'm SORRY!! You can't say "Dirty Harry loved his gun". ... You can't say "Apes loved their culture". ...You can't say "Pinhead loved eating the skinless body of an unsuspecting disco bimbo" and file it all under "Traditional Love Story". There is absolutely NO ARGUEMENT for linking these movies to "Traditional Love Stories".
Why not? (oh, and by the way - I don't recall Pinhead eating the skinless body of an "unsuspecting disco bimbo" in the ORIGINAL FILM. Yes, there is an argument for linking the love of objects other than a man and a woman to a traditional love story. What is traditional really depends on how you were raised and the environment you are currently in. For example, a person who had a destructive or violent family might find a character's love for violence or hate more traditional, whereas someone less jaded will find it more untraditional. Another example would be a same sex love story. For someone who grew up against say gay marriage, I assure you how "traditional" it is will be far different then how someone who is comfortable or okay with it. Another example would be a love that developed over the internet or by phone. That would be less traditional for someone who is not experienced or interested in electronics or the internet, and more traditional for someone who developed a relationship or knows people who developed relationships that way. I could go on and on and on and on about what would be traditional to some and untraditional to others. Now when I think we disagree about what is traditional is a relationship between two human beings. Love can often be between a human being and a state of being, for an object, for a desired emotion, or a wanted state of another object or human being. History has shown us that people often desire pain upon another, money, power, fame, happiness, death for another, or sadness for another.
P.S. You want a love story that steps out of the "Traditional" box? That's "Ghost"! ....Dead guy in love with an alive girl. Traditional, yet untraditional. And he didn't stick his metaphysical penis in her after he was dead.
Okay. What's your point? Traditional love stories can be placed in untraditional settings or circumstances. Anyway, one of the main points I'm trying to make is that traditional is debatable.