Hi everyone, I'm looking to jump in more seriously to video, and I'm starting shooting event videography so I'm selling my Canon 4000d (which just will not handle filming indoors at all I find) I however don't have a huge amount to spend but I am completely stuck between 3 options which are (in order of cheapest to most expensive) the:
Canon 77D (pro: cheapest)
Canon 250D (pro: 4K capable)
Canon 80D (pro: weatherproof)
There seems to be little difference between the 77D and 250D from what I can see (except 250D has 4K ability but its advised to still shoot 1080p for best results) and the 250D is only slightly more expensive than the 77D.
I have seen the 80D heavily recommend in old discussions (2017 or earlier) and there are lots of examples of films on youtube shot on the 80D but it is a much older model now and still a few hundred more expensive yet the comparisons I have watched it doesn't seem that much different from the 77D or 250D.
The pros I added next to each one seem to be the main difference I can find.
It almost feels like I'm trying to pick between almost identical cameras just with different release dates, size/weight comparisons, and price points and I just can't settle on one.
Is there anything I'm overlooking that makes one better than the others before I take the plunge?
Are any of them better in low light? (as grain and flickering is the issue I suffer from the 4000d)
For extra added info the lenses I have are:
* 25mm f/1.8
* 55mm f/1.8
* 18-55mm f/2.8
* 55-200mm f/4-5.6
* 35-80mm f/4-5.6
(I'd prefer to stick with DSLR so I can use the EF-S mount lenses over switching to mirrorless.)
Canon 77D (pro: cheapest)
Canon 250D (pro: 4K capable)
Canon 80D (pro: weatherproof)
There seems to be little difference between the 77D and 250D from what I can see (except 250D has 4K ability but its advised to still shoot 1080p for best results) and the 250D is only slightly more expensive than the 77D.
I have seen the 80D heavily recommend in old discussions (2017 or earlier) and there are lots of examples of films on youtube shot on the 80D but it is a much older model now and still a few hundred more expensive yet the comparisons I have watched it doesn't seem that much different from the 77D or 250D.
The pros I added next to each one seem to be the main difference I can find.
It almost feels like I'm trying to pick between almost identical cameras just with different release dates, size/weight comparisons, and price points and I just can't settle on one.
Is there anything I'm overlooking that makes one better than the others before I take the plunge?
Are any of them better in low light? (as grain and flickering is the issue I suffer from the 4000d)
For extra added info the lenses I have are:
* 25mm f/1.8
* 55mm f/1.8
* 18-55mm f/2.8
* 55-200mm f/4-5.6
* 35-80mm f/4-5.6
(I'd prefer to stick with DSLR so I can use the EF-S mount lenses over switching to mirrorless.)