Many filmmakers I talk to today are always mentioning how they hate 3-D. It's a fad, it isn't needed, or it's a plain rip-off at the movies.
I personally don't feel this way as some 3-D films can really immerse you in the film. Especially if the venue you're in can support the proper 3-D specs intended and if the film was shot specifically for the 3-D experience. I agree though, 80% of 3-D movies out in theaters don't need to be in 3-D, a good film shouldn't "rely" on 3-D effects, and yes it's expensive.
If you're not a fan of 3-D, why do you feel that and what experiences really made you dislike it? If you like 3-D in movies, why is that and which movies did you see had 3-D effects that truly enhanced the story?
I personally don't feel this way as some 3-D films can really immerse you in the film. Especially if the venue you're in can support the proper 3-D specs intended and if the film was shot specifically for the 3-D experience. I agree though, 80% of 3-D movies out in theaters don't need to be in 3-D, a good film shouldn't "rely" on 3-D effects, and yes it's expensive.
If you're not a fan of 3-D, why do you feel that and what experiences really made you dislike it? If you like 3-D in movies, why is that and which movies did you see had 3-D effects that truly enhanced the story?