When my film team works with composers ...
... when we send them a new film edit ...
... The director, producers, network all have to give feedback ...
Sounds to me like a lot of people being asked/encouraged to meddle in the affairs of others! Why do the producers and network
all have to give feedback at what seems to be quite a late stage in the process? Surely the director would look for/be given a set of guidelines as to style, content and budget at the beginning, before any composer was involved, so what useful feedback on the score can the producer or the network offer when the film has been shot and edited?
And why is the
whole team working with the composers? Unless the film includes scenes of musicians actually performing, there's really no reason why anyone other than the director should have any contact with the composer or any musicians. Okay, maybe if things are being done at short notice, or in a very dynamic way, the editor and audio mixer might need some involvement too while the score is evolving, but who else and why?
As
@indietalk says, a single locked picture edit would leave the composer with a definite context within which to work. Presumably the director would have earlier given an idea of the musical style that had been cleared with the producer and network, so the composer could have been working on a variety of themes while waiting for the final edit. Some sample scenes might help guide them in their composition, and shorten the time needed later, but until the final cut is ready to be scored, there's really no need for "insane" feedback from anyone - just direction!
