I don't know why everyone is against manual white balancing? Can't get more exact than that.
I, for one, am more used to traditional film - 5600k or 3200k. Pick one and gel your lights accordingly. Even on an Alexa or Red, you have to dial in the colour temperature, rather than just being able to manual white balance. Therefore I tend to stick around 5600k or 3200k, or sometimes vary depending on the effect/look I want.
Even with DSLRs it's much more difficult and time consuming to have to take a picture and all the rest of it, than just pick a setting, or dial in a colour temperature. It also means that I can set the colour temperature to whatever I want - 5600k to make 3200 lamps warm, or 4300k to make the daylight a little cool and the tungsten lights a little warm. It's all creative choice, and manual white balancing can at times be much more time consuming, and also difficult to get exact colour temperatures - ie, If I want to balance to daylight and make my lamps go warm, I can WB outside. Except, what if it's an inside scene? Do I now have to setup a light, and gel it, just to colour balance? What if I want to balance to 4300k? or 4800k?
That said, unless you really do understand colour temperature, and/or have a large collection of gels at your disposal (they ain't cheap

) you'll be better off manually white balancing. Also, for documentaries, reality, TV and ENG in general, it can look better.