Another vote for the "too clean" comment ; and if Bosko and Priah are on a trek where they haven't even enough food to eat, their "perfect hair, perfect skin, perfect teeth" appearance feels wrong.
Before I continue, I would like to echo pedramyz's remark in respect to the comments below: I think you've done a good job on a budget, but maybe the festival people spotted these things too ...?
First up: the tavern sequence just didn't make sense to me. Who's the young girl? who's the guy with the patch - oh, it's Bosko ... why does he have a towel over one eye? where did the Oktoberfest barmaid come from ...? It reminded me of the old days, when you'd try to record one episode of a series on VHS tape, get the timing wrong and on playback, the end would cut abruptly to something else you'd recorded ages ago. It's neither a beginning nor an ending, and just doesn't seem to belong with the other story.
Personal taste: I'd have preferred the flashback to have been inserted earlier, say after Bosko warns the main villain that the Priah is a dangerous creature. Then cut back to the fight scene.
I appreciate that it's cut the way it is to explain why Priah feels she owes Bosko something, but (again personal taste, and also see below) one bowl of soup isn't really that big a debt ... (Also: what's going on with Bosko and his hand? - he was stabbed in the chest ...) (Another also: why does Bosko need to use the name Fox?)
Technical points: the lighting in the woodland scenes is quite inconsistent, and some of the camera angles too.
In the flashback, Bosko is alternately in bright sunshine and deep shade several times over, even though he's not moving from his tree! Similarly in the opening scene, the main villain is so brightly lit in contrast to the others and the forest, it almost looks like his part was shot against a greenscreen! And in the long (loooonnnnggg) walk sequence, the shadows, sunbeams and sunset in the different shots are all a bit muddled. I couldn't figure out if this was one day's walk, or supposed to indicate their progress over several days. The fact that the actors' appearance doesn't change at all from start to finish doesn't help ...
The (change of) camera angle that most distracted me is at 2:09, close-up on the baldy-bearded bad-guy: just prior to the cut, with the two principals in the foreground on either side, he's framed against a tight stand of mature trees, right behind him, all quite menacing and in keeping with the mood; then for the close-up, he's moved to a different part of the woods, much more airy and light, with younger, slender trees far behind, and with a brightly dressed, jester-like character fidgeting in the background. Huh?
All of the above makes me wonder how much of each scene was shot on the fly, how much was fully storyboarded and blocked, were some of these shots re-shoots a week later, etc. As a primarily still-photographer (at the moment), I'm commenting above my paygrade, but I would see these as straightforward directing & cinematography oversights (or even "mistakes") that spoil an otherwise good production.
It thought the sound went a bit flat in the middle, especially during the flashback -
Alcove Audio's comments on Odd Ginger's thread would apply here too: needs more Foley! And some "epic" music for that long walk.
Ignoring the final scene, I found the script/dialogue pretty good (for the genre), the choice of locations was in keeping with each sequence, and the CGI was nicely done, not too over-the-top (a definite positive compared to many big budget movies). If it was re-shot with more attention to wardrobe&make-up and to those lighting details, and probably tightened up to about 10 minutes, I could better imagine it as a teaser for the adventures of Bosko & Priah.
Hope that's not too brutal a review ....