"So what you call "wordy" is actually a four-line paragraph used to set-up everything else that follows"
Which to be frank is the amateurish way to do it. Especially with a phone call, which like VO is ALWAYS playing with fire and to be avoided unless it REALLY makes sense and is necessary.
A shot of a magazine cover with her on it would establish her as a top model.
The way the gigolo looks and how she reacts to him at the door would let us know he's a gigolo, without ever having to say it.
Now this is coming from a guy who has made films where the first line of dialogue isn't spoken until 6 minutes into the film, so I am at the other extreme, but...
You're kidding right?
And I don't know where you were told a phone call is "amateurish" but later today I'll get you a list of 20 quality films where a phone conversation is used to rely information.
(In fact, isn't that the way "Pillow Talk" opens? Nevermind)
"Wordy" is not what Skreamings meant. He got that wrong too.
He was trying to say the dialog was unnecessary not that it was verbose.
The way the gigolo looks and how she reacts to him at the door would let us know he's a gigolo, without ever having to say it.
Well, that's ridiculous and even if it were credible, the time it would have taken for him and her to transmit that message without words would have been far longer than the one sentence of dialog used:
"He charges $500 an
hour, but Tyra says he’s worth
every nickel of it."
Here's how your suggestion looks:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
She goes to the door, opens it, and standing there is Sergio, a man who looks like a gigalo. The expression on his face tells us he IS a gigalo while the expression on her face tell us he's a gigalo she's hired at $500 an hour.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Ridiculous, right?
Seriously, Gonzo, show us how you'd convey all that information just by how he looks and she looks at him.
Write it out here, I'd love to see how you pull it off.
And it's not just you. I challenge anyone to write that part of the scene better than I did while transmitting all the information I did in one short paragraph.
Dialog providing background information is staple of drama. It's allowable and when needed the writer should simply put it in and move on.
My sense is you guys don't actually understand how dialog works in drama.
Skreamings can't write dialog so he considers it a fault when he sees it in other screenplays.
This makes him a crippled writer.