Panasonic GH2 and AF-100
Discuss?
http://www.dpreview.com/previews/panasonicdmcgh2/
GH2 video samples for your viewing pleasure. There are some stills in a couple of them.
http://vimeo.com/14725884
http://vimeo.com/15340175
http://vimeo.com/15485479
Not sure what is causing the pulsating light in the last one. The first two are pretty sweet. I'm impressed at out the shutter captures the motion of the wake of the boat. Actually seriously considering one of these despite the slightly smaller sensor compared with APS-C found in the Canon cameras. Yes the Mpixel count is also lower, but the down-sampled compression has (in my opinion) superior image quality to the line skipped compression that Canon is using. The GH2 looks to have a superior color quality to the GH1, although maybe not quite as "already pretty" looking as the Canon lineup. Still, I'm pretty impressed with what I saw in the first two vids.
(edit)
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/search?Ntt=gh2&N=0&InitialSearch=yes
$900-1500, essentially t2i/550d price range, maybe a bit higher for the 14-140 lens.
(/edit)
This is the big brother, the AF-100.
http://pro-av.panasonic.net/en/af100/index.html
Which maybe I, or someone else, has posted here before? Anyway. Like I mentioned in a different thread, not ready nor can afford something of this level - but with the features listed at $5K it's really appealing.
I like the idea of this format, just about any lens type can be used - so all my FD stuff and maybe even some of my c mount lenses as well can come into play. There's something cool about the image quality of old glass, even with the crop factor (2x for the FD mount glass) or vignetting (the 16mm c mount stuff) I'm into the idea.
So, what do folks think? One review I read commented that m4/3 could become the "super 16" of the HD cinema world. I also kinda like that idea. Is the sensor just plain too small for the format to catch on with the folks who sign the checks?
Discuss?
http://www.dpreview.com/previews/panasonicdmcgh2/
GH2 video samples for your viewing pleasure. There are some stills in a couple of them.
http://vimeo.com/14725884
http://vimeo.com/15340175
http://vimeo.com/15485479
Not sure what is causing the pulsating light in the last one. The first two are pretty sweet. I'm impressed at out the shutter captures the motion of the wake of the boat. Actually seriously considering one of these despite the slightly smaller sensor compared with APS-C found in the Canon cameras. Yes the Mpixel count is also lower, but the down-sampled compression has (in my opinion) superior image quality to the line skipped compression that Canon is using. The GH2 looks to have a superior color quality to the GH1, although maybe not quite as "already pretty" looking as the Canon lineup. Still, I'm pretty impressed with what I saw in the first two vids.
(edit)
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/search?Ntt=gh2&N=0&InitialSearch=yes
$900-1500, essentially t2i/550d price range, maybe a bit higher for the 14-140 lens.
(/edit)
This is the big brother, the AF-100.
http://pro-av.panasonic.net/en/af100/index.html
Which maybe I, or someone else, has posted here before? Anyway. Like I mentioned in a different thread, not ready nor can afford something of this level - but with the features listed at $5K it's really appealing.
I like the idea of this format, just about any lens type can be used - so all my FD stuff and maybe even some of my c mount lenses as well can come into play. There's something cool about the image quality of old glass, even with the crop factor (2x for the FD mount glass) or vignetting (the 16mm c mount stuff) I'm into the idea.
So, what do folks think? One review I read commented that m4/3 could become the "super 16" of the HD cinema world. I also kinda like that idea. Is the sensor just plain too small for the format to catch on with the folks who sign the checks?
Last edited: