Indeed. But, I was referring to it still being employed, regardless of how much. Every camera technique has its time and place, but saying that it "should not be done" was what I commented on.
100% agreement. But let me make some analogies to clarify my opinion.
Every now and then, a root canal is the dental procedure best suited to fix a person's teeth. On rare occasion, the Hail Mary is just exactly the play that a football team should call. Depending on the event, once in a blue-moon, there might be a reason to wear a neon-yellow piano-necktie.
But if every time you went to the dentist, you got a root canal...
if your favorite football team ran the Hail Mary, every single down...
if the whole world started wearing neon-yellow piano-neckties...
You might soon start to realize that they are all kinda shitty experiences. Like a root canal, if a zoom isn't
exactly what is needed in that situation, it's just plain painfull, and rather pointless.
Haha. Most stuff not done by working professionals looks like home-video, though. xP
Mmm, I can't agree with that. Put your camera on a tripod, lock it down, no pan, no tilt, no nothing. Just rely on solid storytelling, and you can rest assured that the work of a noob will be
nothing like a home video.
Zooming in post is different than zooming in camera. You don't change perspective in post, in camera you change FOV, AOV and compression. It can be an interesting effect, though! Kind of "disorienting" but could be in a good way.
True. I'd say that both methods are "disorienting", and you should either go balls-to-the-wall, or keep the effect really subtle.