Can anyone confirm the cnet review saying
The good:
Nice manual features; attractive design; high-quality audio; low-noise, low-light video.
The bad:
Ineffectual optical stabilizer; needs a built-in ND filter; some horizontal jitter and stuttering during playback; low-resolution video; sad battery life.
The bottom line:
If this camcorder cost $500, we'd give it a much higher rating. But for its quadruple-digit price, we expect far better performance and video quality from the JVC Everio GZ-HD7.
Is "The Bad" Very accurate? Because i will be doing some handheld stuff and i think i should have image stabilization. And Low Res? I heard it was good...can anyone who owns this camera tell me more about it?
The good:
Nice manual features; attractive design; high-quality audio; low-noise, low-light video.
The bad:
Ineffectual optical stabilizer; needs a built-in ND filter; some horizontal jitter and stuttering during playback; low-resolution video; sad battery life.
The bottom line:
If this camcorder cost $500, we'd give it a much higher rating. But for its quadruple-digit price, we expect far better performance and video quality from the JVC Everio GZ-HD7.
Is "The Bad" Very accurate? Because i will be doing some handheld stuff and i think i should have image stabilization. And Low Res? I heard it was good...can anyone who owns this camera tell me more about it?