Hello to all,
first of all, love the site! I think this may be my first post on here, but I'm always here reading different threads. Very useful information!
My question is this:
I've written a script in which the antagonist is never completely seen; he's always partially shown and we always hear him talk (he narrates a good chunk of the story during his scenes), but we never see his face. It goes with his ideology that it doesn't really matter who is committing the crimes; that he's no one special, just an average person you'd see in a store, walking down the street, or at the bank.
Do you think this technique would be suspenseful to the audience or do you think they would get tired of it quickly and lose interest in him?
first of all, love the site! I think this may be my first post on here, but I'm always here reading different threads. Very useful information!
My question is this:
I've written a script in which the antagonist is never completely seen; he's always partially shown and we always hear him talk (he narrates a good chunk of the story during his scenes), but we never see his face. It goes with his ideology that it doesn't really matter who is committing the crimes; that he's no one special, just an average person you'd see in a store, walking down the street, or at the bank.
Do you think this technique would be suspenseful to the audience or do you think they would get tired of it quickly and lose interest in him?