news M. Night Shyamalan Almost Directed ‘Life of Pi’: ‘That Was One I Wish I Did’

From his early success with “The Sixth Sense” and “Unbreakable” to his mid-2000s dry spell that included “After Earth” and “The Last Airbender,” M. Night Shyamalan’s roller coaster of a career has taken him through every level of Hollywood. The multi-hyphenate has found renewed success in recent years directing mid-budget genre films like “Old” and “Knock at the Cabin,” but that doesn’t mean he’s stopped thinking about some of the bigger projects that he flirted with over the years. In a new interview with The Hollywood Reporter, Shyamalan reflected on some of the projects that he came close to directing over the course of his three decade career.

“I loved the book ‘Life of Pi,’ and I was going to make it. But Ang Lee made a beautiful movie from it. That was one that I wished I did,” Shyamalan said. “In between the first two movies I wrote a spec screenplay called ‘Labor of Love,’ and it became a giant bidding war in Hollywood. Fox then bought it, and they fired me as a director because I was a kid. I almost made it many, many times since, but at this point, I probably won’t ever make it.”

But while every filmmaker has a few lost projects they wish had materialized, Shyamalan isn’t too upset about missing out on those two films. The director explained that he’s happy to have found a creative home at Universal where he can continue to develop original projects, an opportunity that is afforded to increasingly few filmmakers.

“They’ve been very good at letting us do our thing, and they’re just very kind people,” he said of Universal. “They have not shied away from the original movie, which has been to their great benefit. I wish the whole industry would embrace the original movie and bring it back. Once upon a time, the entire industry was geared solely toward original movies. Finding and supporting new voices that can reach large audiences used to be the major thing, and Universal has now made that a mandate.”

“Knock at the Cabin” is now playing in theaters.
 
I'm sure we're all regretting that Shamylan didn't direct "Life of Pi" instead of that hack Ang Lee. Lol. (for those that don't get the joke, Ang Lee is maybe 10x as good a filmmaker as Shamylan)
 
Well he didn't say he'd make it better it sounds like he had a connection to the story and wanted to make it, like a passion project, but someone already made it beautifully. What is your issue with how he said it?
 
Oh, nothing really, I'm just riffing on an open mic to amuse myself. I don't like Shamylan much because of his pattern of plagiarism, and I feel like he's one of those directors that is undeservedly given project after project because of a single jackpot win in 2000.

Roland Emmerich for example made independence day, and it was a huge hit for the studio. Decades later, they still give him a quarter billion dollars every couple of years, hoping that it will happen again, even though he's failed 10x in a row now. Each time they do, there are 250 would be filmmakers who have to be denied even a single chance to make a 1 million dollar film, limiting the number of new voices in the creative sphere. I look at these guys, and all I see is invisible graveyards full of broken dreams, and one super rich guy doing, on average, just passable work.

There must be thousands of great artists now that have been sidelined to make more room for Shamylan and Emmerich. They made about 4 good movies between the two of them.
 
Well one could think he passed it up by the title but yeah. Seems he just wanted to make it but admitted it's been done right already. I have no real opinions on him.
 
I might be too harsh on him. He did do a fine job directing "The Village"

Also I'm a fan of Ang Lee, who I think has incredible talent at cinematic spectacle.
 
I actually think it'd be cool to see different directors' takes on stories. Once, I had this idea (that Hollywood is free to steal), that you make the same film by two different known directors and release them on the same day. The marketing is like a director vs. director and the money is big because people are inclined to see both to make their decision. But the real idea is to see each vision, which really interests me.
 
I actually think it'd be cool to see different directors' takes on stories. Once, I had this idea (that Hollywood is free to steal), that you make the same film by two different known directors and release them on the same day. The marketing is like a director vs. director and the money is big because people are inclined to see both to make their decision. But the real idea is to see each vision, which really interests me.
I think that's a really cool idea. I wouldn't be shocked if they did it some day. It actually makes a lot of sense. You'd get free press, there's only one script to license, people would argue about which one was better for years, viewing parties, etc. Makes a lot of sense. We've kind of gotten to see that with franchises like Spiderman and The Hulk, not simultaniously, but over time we do see multiple directors try the same story at least. Spiderman's origin story seems to be the all time most repeated plot. "With great power comes great responsibility" and all that.
 
Back
Top