How is sufficient light provided on extremely long steadicam shots?
http://nofilmschool.com/2013/03/career-paul-thomas-anderson-five-shots-steadicam
http://www.wimp.com/longsteadicam/
In the above links, there are very long continuous steadicam shots that have relatively deep DOF. My question is, how do they achieve sufficient lighting using (what looks like) only practicals? Are they simply extremely bright practicals or are there other lights being used on the scene? It just seems like these shots would require a lot of light because of 1. the small aperture being used to achieve deep DOF, and 2. the need to have only practical lights wherever the camera is going to be looking.
I suppose one could boost the ISO and try to do it that way, but the examples above show little to no noise, so I'm curious as to how they get this super clean image.
http://nofilmschool.com/2013/03/career-paul-thomas-anderson-five-shots-steadicam
http://www.wimp.com/longsteadicam/
In the above links, there are very long continuous steadicam shots that have relatively deep DOF. My question is, how do they achieve sufficient lighting using (what looks like) only practicals? Are they simply extremely bright practicals or are there other lights being used on the scene? It just seems like these shots would require a lot of light because of 1. the small aperture being used to achieve deep DOF, and 2. the need to have only practical lights wherever the camera is going to be looking.
I suppose one could boost the ISO and try to do it that way, but the examples above show little to no noise, so I'm curious as to how they get this super clean image.
