IMDB?

one tries to add legit credits and is met with.... no studio system hangover at work here.... :yes:

Just an observation. the Dude who tied to sell me a Chevy is DGA member and gripe how inaccurate it (bir bro) is.
And now this the man rejecting my resume.. . the man dat is...
 
Um okay lol. Accurate or inaccurate if you don't like it just avoid it. It's just a website. Or submit corrections. Big brother? They're not watching you, you have to input the info, and I would think that it would be beneficial if published so I don't get what you're saying.

Oh well.
 
Nothing big bro about IMDB as far as I know...from what I understand they do scrutinize what they put in, so that may be part of it.


IMDB is good...IMDB loves us...*ahem*

;)
 
I'm confused by the OP altogether. It's an informational resource, and therefore needs information to be useful. As with every community driven information source, there's a chance for inaccuracy since they don't control the data entry personnel... (which is why Wikis aren't accepted by academia).

I'd love to get a couple of my pieces up on there, especially the one that was supposed to be on there as a prize for screening in London - (bitter much?).
 
Paranoid? Orwell? Big Bro... Yikes? Or am just freaking dude?

You're just freaking out. It's a database, nothing more nothing less.


one tries to add legit credits and is met with.... no studio system hangover at work here.... :yes:

Just an observation. the Dude who tied to sell me a Chevy is DGA member and gripe how inaccurate it (bir bro) is.
And now this the man rejecting my resume.. . the man dat is...

The DGA does have a degree of control over IMDB, in that once the Internet Movie Database was sold to Amazon about 8-9 years ago, the unions exercized a level of authority to have names removed that are not guild and union authorized, as did SAG and the WGA.

IMDB used to include unauthorized names for a film title - IE Kevin Smith (Clerks, Cop Out) had done an uncredited re-write of a movie called OVERNIGHT DELIVERY. Several of his lines and plot points remained in the final film, but because of the Writers Guild of America and a complaint from one of the other writers, the film credit went through arbitration and Kevin Smith was NOT granted an on screen credit. His name WAS on IMDB as a screenwriter, but once Amazon.com took over IMDB, they had to remove his name. All movies where a ghost writer or multiple other writers were involved were removed.

Similarly, the additional director of ALIEN 3 (Renny Harlin replaced David Fincher for almost 50% of the movie), had his name removed from IMDB after the take over because the DGA credited solely one director.

As for independent films, especially what is now truly independent, no budget movies - you have to qualify for entry as a credit and for the film. It has to be "significantly released to the public" and not just on YouTube, but released theatrically where the public can/could have seen it. Not every film festival qualifies either.

I love IMDB. I've been writing TRIVIA entries for over 10 years.

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0743748/

- PJR=
 
s for independent films, especially what is now truly independent, no budget movies - you have to qualify for entry as a credit and for the film. It has to be "significantly released to the public" and not just on YouTube, but released theatrically where the public can/could have seen it. Not every film festival qualifies either.

Our film Death Bed has 3 Official selection laurels and others that have only screened at the first event have made it in. I wish they would post either what they're looking for - or why they reject the items they reject... the process is very frustrating.
 
Our film Death Bed has 3 Official selection laurels and others that have only screened at the first event have made it in. I wish they would post either what they're looking for - or why they reject the items they reject... the process is very frustrating.

Here ya go from the IMDB title page entry...

Eligibility rules

For a work to be eligible for inclusion in the database it:

* must be of general public interest and
* should be available to the public or have been available in the past.

It does not have to be a feature film. We accept most kinds of films/shows:

* features
* documentaries
* experimental films
* short films, but for the time being no commercials, video clips or music videos (these go to the biographical section under 'other works')
* films made for the big screen, TV and video
* TV series and mini series (see below about episodes)
* video games

General public interest is assumed if a work...

* has been released to cinemas
* has been shown on non-local TV
* has been released on video or prints have been made available to the public (but see exceptions below on limited distribution titles)
* is listed in the catalog of an established video retailer (e.g., Amazon.com)
* has been accepted and shown on film festivals that don't accept everything regardless of its quality (if you have doubt, see this page for details)
* has been made by a (now) famous artist or person of public interest.
* has become famous for some reason and is widely talked about/referenced in non-local media or the 'film community' or is now of general historic interest for some reason.

General public interest is NOT given just because a work...

* has been digitized and put on some internet page for downloading (unless general public interest is assumed for one of the reasons stated above)
* is being offered to the public on the web via home made video tape/DVD-R copies (unless general public interest is assumed for one of the reasons stated above)
* has been made during/for a film class, workshop or any other educational program (unless general public interest is assumed for one of the reasons stated above)
* has been made for a local institution (such as a university or company) for internal use (unless general public interest is assumed for one of the reasons stated above)
* is of a strictly private nature (home movies)
* is an amateur production made for local consumption by friends, family members and neighbours, the local school campus etc. (including "local access television")

IMDb retains the right to reject any work whose eligibility according to above rules is dubious and/or unverifiable. This may include works which are in their very first development stages. If you would like to submit a project in development, please sign-up for IMDbPro. IMDb retains the right to change and adapt eligibility rules as circumstances require.

Note that, while individual TV series episodes are accepted, they should not be submitted with this form; instead, you should use the "Add Episode" button associated with the series title.
Adding the new title

Now that you have read the format description and eligibility rules above, you may add the title to the database. Please note that titles are not automatically added; the data is sent to the IMDb title managers who will verify the existence and eligibility of the title and, if acceptable, add it. The more information you provide, the more chance we will be able to verify the title and add it to the database. Once the title itself has been added to the database, it normally takes at least another week for the information submitted along with it to also appear.

We will now lead you through a series of steps to collect the required information for your title. Please complete as many of the forms as possible at each stage and then press the 'Continue' button to move on to the next step.

In the 'Title' form below please type the title as it appears on screen in the opening credits, paying attention to the formatting rules above. In order to simplify things please do not include the IMDb specific tags such as the year, (TV), (V) etc as we will calculate and add those automatically on your behalf based on your choice in the 'Type' and 'Year' sections below.

In the 'Type' section choose the correct type for your title. If you choose 'Film' or 'TV' we will ask a further question in the next stage to refine the exact type of the title (watch for the 'Subtype' category appearing under the main 'Type' field in the next page).

In the 'Status' section choose the option which most accurately reflects the release status of this title. We will ask for evidence of public screenings in later stages if you select the 'Released' option and your title was made after 1999.

In the 'Year' form enter the year of first public screening as defined by the rules above.

Finally for this stage identify yourself from the 'I am...' menu, selecting the option which most accurately reflects your connection to this title.

After gathering further initial information on the next few screens we will perform one final search for existing titles close to this title and you will need to confirm your title is genuinely new. We will then show other categories of information we require in order to validate the title. Please provide as much information as possible since the more data you supply, the easier and faster we can verify and add this title. If you require any help on any of the sections look for a blue '?' to the right and click this for specific help on that section.
 
I'm assuming that it's because we had a REALLY small crew and the positions weren't all filled. I followed this document when I submitted both times. I should try again and see if I can get it to go.

we've had 2 additional screenings since then.
 
I'm assuming that it's because we had a REALLY small crew and the positions weren't all filled. I followed this document when I submitted both times. I should try again and see if I can get it to go.

we've had 2 additional screenings since then.

Make sure to include verifiable 3rd party links to the screenings.... that's the most common mistake I see in submissions.
 
On the Without-A-Box main page there is a pulldown list of festivals of which mere submission to supposedly guarantee your film an IMDB title page. You don't even need to get accepted; you just need to submit. The worst piece of crap my name was ever attached to was submitted by the producer via WOB to three of these, accepted at none, and suddenly I have my first IMDB credit. Meanwhile the short I'm most proud of, which won at festival last summer, remains at the bottom of the list because that particular festival isn't a "qualifier."

I believe this (new?) policy sort of tarnishes the prestige I had long associated with IMDB (sort of makes it seem like your money is only legal tender at The Company Store), but damn if it ain't cool to point people to it.
 
I believe this (new?) policy sort of tarnishes the prestige I had long associated with IMDB (sort of makes it seem like your money is only legal tender at The Company Store), but damn if it ain't cool to point people to it.


FYI anyone with an IMDB PRO account now supposedly gets the title entry in no matter what too...
 
Screw IMDb, man. They've rejected every title I've ever submitted, even the ones with distribution or that have played in festivals. Meanwhile I see amateur student films on there. Who ya gotta blow??? ;)
 
Screw IMDb, man. They've rejected every title I've ever submitted, even the ones with distribution or that have played in festivals. Meanwhile I see amateur student films on there. Who ya gotta blow??? ;)

That is really weird because my last film was listed purely on the basis of being SUBMITTED to a qualifying festival. It wasn't even accepted. I might be because I used witoutabox, who is tied in with IMDB.
 
That's definitely more work than what's required to contribute to Wikipedia.

LOL

I got Gun Town on there before it was even done, and it's just a shoestring budget indie film, my first one at that. No WOB, festivals or anything. Direct to Self-Distribution. Not braggin', just sayin'.

And I too have no clue as to the OP which is plainly incoherent.
 
Back
Top