archived-videos Hey again people, looking for a critique here.

Never shoot 4:3 unless you have a time machine capable of going back to 1998, though if you do have such a time machine, you could undoubtedly trade it for a 16:9 camera
 
You're from Birmingham so I presume you realise that Birmingham's not in London, right? :lol:

I wasn't sure what to expect after the into video but, to be honest, I thought it was going to be more interesting. I liked the archive footage and the film noir vibe but the second video was just a guy with a shoebox on his head running about... I lost the plot slightly.
 
If you shoot in 4:3, you can always letterbox for the up-to-date look.

(to the techies: Yes, I know about the lost information thing, but heck, filmmaking is all about creating illusions. Its fun to fool people into thinking a image that was actually shot on SD 4:3 came from a $35k camera.

(ps: I didn't watch any of the videos . . . too many to choose from. Select your best one please!)
 
It's all one video in 3 parts. Not too bad, but definitely another "destination internet" type work.

It had an ok sense of humor, so that's better than most web fare.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top