Uranium: Glad you liked it! I think you're right about the narration, but I'm inclined to keep it. However, after reading the feedback, and thinking about it, I do believe your instincts are right, and it's heavy-handed and over-narrated. I've cut the narration back to bare bones, which I think works much better.
Dready: Glad you enjoyed! I like your ending, and I might just use it. My only concern is how hard it would be to bring a pig into a butcher shop, etc. Another location, another character (butcher/narrator), and shooting with animal actors!
Also, this was written for Uranium City's call for short scripts. I got a million ideas and they keep bubbling up, and it interrupts my work on my feature. Owel.
VP: Thanks for reading! All good ideas on getting rid of the narrator. I wonder: What's the consensus here on SHOWING the wand itself? I didn't want it to be a fixation in the story, more left to the imagination, but maybe it'd be more effective if it was concrete. Hmmmmm...
Wheat: I was thinking "perch," but my fingers typed "roost." So I'll tidy that up! As for what he sees under the trees, see above concerning the wand... I appreciate your feedback!
Thanks my friends!
-Charles