Hi,
Someone recommended these forums to me, hopefully you'll be able to help with my dilemma.
I wouldn't be surprised if this question has been asked a thousand times but DSLR's are brand new to me. I had been working with a Panasonic DVX100A for years and finally decided it was time to get a new camera.
So after a lot of research, I've narrowed it down to these two options (in case you're wondering, 5d III and II are not options due to budget and panasonic gh2 is being ignored just because)
So 7D vs 60D for filmmaking (a lot of times discussions and comparisons of these cameras don't help me because people arn't talking about filmmaking, they're either talking about the photography aspect, or some type of cheap videographer work)
Now quite a few people have told me there is NO difference between the video quality of the two. They say considering they have the same sensor and only use a small % of it for video, that there's no difference.
however, I've heard in other places that maybe 7d is better in low lighting and that the dual processors could help it manage more.
My big reasons for wanting the 60D:
-Cheaper (including cheaper media cards)
-Swivel screen
-and if I understand correctly, it's software is a little more video friendly, though recent firmware updates may have change that
My big reason for wanting the 7D:
-"You get what you paid for" has been drilled into my head since infancy
and then this may be the big one:
-I have yet to see a video or short that proves the 60d can do what the 7d can do. Period.
Of course there are a lot of those "side by side with the same settings and the same lens" videos and on those they look the same
BUT
everytime I go on youtube and type in "7d short film" the stuff I see is always better looking than when I type in "60d short film"
Could that be just better filmmakers? Of course. But it really makes me paranoid. The 7d first became a big option to me when I came across a guy advertising his film, I asked him what it was shot on and he said 7D. I have yet to see ANYTHING shot on the 60d that looks nearly as good (the film is moonflower of moonflowermovie.com)
So based on that movie, and other youtube examples: I KNOW what the 7D can do. I have yet to find anything that makes me feel the same about the 60d. (I've seen a few good shorts...but they looked "video'ish" to me. Cheaper looking.)
So the dilemma basically comes down to: 60D and 7d are supposed to have the same video quality (according to a good many people) but I've yet to see a 60d production that convinces me that's true.
Someone recommended these forums to me, hopefully you'll be able to help with my dilemma.
I wouldn't be surprised if this question has been asked a thousand times but DSLR's are brand new to me. I had been working with a Panasonic DVX100A for years and finally decided it was time to get a new camera.
So after a lot of research, I've narrowed it down to these two options (in case you're wondering, 5d III and II are not options due to budget and panasonic gh2 is being ignored just because)
So 7D vs 60D for filmmaking (a lot of times discussions and comparisons of these cameras don't help me because people arn't talking about filmmaking, they're either talking about the photography aspect, or some type of cheap videographer work)
Now quite a few people have told me there is NO difference between the video quality of the two. They say considering they have the same sensor and only use a small % of it for video, that there's no difference.
however, I've heard in other places that maybe 7d is better in low lighting and that the dual processors could help it manage more.
My big reasons for wanting the 60D:
-Cheaper (including cheaper media cards)
-Swivel screen
-and if I understand correctly, it's software is a little more video friendly, though recent firmware updates may have change that
My big reason for wanting the 7D:
-"You get what you paid for" has been drilled into my head since infancy
and then this may be the big one:
-I have yet to see a video or short that proves the 60d can do what the 7d can do. Period.
Of course there are a lot of those "side by side with the same settings and the same lens" videos and on those they look the same
BUT
everytime I go on youtube and type in "7d short film" the stuff I see is always better looking than when I type in "60d short film"
Could that be just better filmmakers? Of course. But it really makes me paranoid. The 7d first became a big option to me when I came across a guy advertising his film, I asked him what it was shot on and he said 7D. I have yet to see ANYTHING shot on the 60d that looks nearly as good (the film is moonflower of moonflowermovie.com)
So based on that movie, and other youtube examples: I KNOW what the 7D can do. I have yet to find anything that makes me feel the same about the 60d. (I've seen a few good shorts...but they looked "video'ish" to me. Cheaper looking.)
So the dilemma basically comes down to: 60D and 7d are supposed to have the same video quality (according to a good many people) but I've yet to see a 60d production that convinces me that's true.