I am in dire need upgrading from a Nikon D90 for a project I need to start soon. I want to stick with DSLRs because I love the shallow depth of field and small size of the cameras. I've pretty much narrowed my selection down to either the 5d mark ii or mark iii.
The reason I am skeptical about going for the mark iii is because I am not sure if it is worth the extra $1,500 if I am primarily using it for video. From what I understand, the video quality is improved over the mark ii, but is it really worth the extra $1,500? I mean if the mark ii was good enough to shoot an episode of House, I'm sure its quality is good enough for my short film projects.
The new audio features of the mark iii are nice (monitoring audio on the LCD and adjusting it while recording), but I always record my sound externally anyway.
Right now I am a bit conflicted on my choice and was hoping that I could get some feedback.
The reason I am skeptical about going for the mark iii is because I am not sure if it is worth the extra $1,500 if I am primarily using it for video. From what I understand, the video quality is improved over the mark ii, but is it really worth the extra $1,500? I mean if the mark ii was good enough to shoot an episode of House, I'm sure its quality is good enough for my short film projects.
The new audio features of the mark iii are nice (monitoring audio on the LCD and adjusting it while recording), but I always record my sound externally anyway.
Right now I am a bit conflicted on my choice and was hoping that I could get some feedback.