I very recently got a blu-ray player because my dvd player died. Bought a couple blu-rays to see if I could tell the difference, or if I cared. The answer was, yes, I could tell, but no, I didn't care. So I'll do what I always do: buy what I find cheap. Hell, I still have a VHS collection! And using harpsichoid's video game analogy, I still play old video games, though there's no question that the ps3 has better graphics than the Atari/Intellivision games I still love. Currently replaying Dragon Warrior VIII on the PS2. I play through all the Zelda games more frequently than anyone should admit to, and have just as much fun with the first as with the latest.
But, again, I think the debate isn't dvd vs. blu-ray (or whatever the next format is). It's physical vs. virtual. As an artist, I love virtual sales because it keeps duplication and shipping costs down. As a consumer, however, I don't care for it.
Oh, and the triple play thing is very wasteful. 31 discs for the new harry potter box set coming out. Take out the duplicate dvds, and you are down to 23. I'm personally not interested in the two 3d discs either, at least I can see the value added there. At least the upcoming Avengers box set is one format, films only duplicated for 3d copies. And, hey, much more reasonable price. Imagine that.
</rant>