Involvement in film simply IS, to a large degree, a case of becoming involved with technology. While not everyone's course/direction, my own involvement in film presently involves a ton (tonne?) of research around a number of technological areas:
-cameras;
-the parts that make up the box & how they work;
-the throughput/product from camera through the box to final product/output;
-this does not touch on the areas I mentioned earlier in another thread eg. sound, lighting.
I think that an independent director, if he/she takes the craft seriously, has no choice BUT to get involved with these, to obtain a good, solid foundation or working knowledge.
We are not friends, technology and I, but certainly over the past two years I have learned to have a begrudging respect for it.
I think that generally,many women in the West at least, do not like to get deeply involved in & with technology--it is an almost geeky involvement. And, let's face it, it is.As a filmmaker, you have to try & reconcile the art & the science/technology.
On the other hand, I know that there are lots of female engineers in my part of the world, and that one of my female friends is an Associate Professor in Operations Research, which is _heavily numerate_.In the earlier communist countries, there were quite a number of women produced who were working in the hard sciences, & technology fields.
Just an observation.