LOGAN L Productions said:I don't feel too strongly about this, but allow me to just explain MY understanding of why there is an electoral college:
...basically, it keeps New York, Texas, and Claifornia from choosing our presidents.
If there was no electoral college, then VERY few demographics would have any say in our leadership. The college gives the Alaskans, Montanans, farmers, etc. of this country a small chance to make a difference in the outcome. It sort of balances out the highly populated areas of the country, because, at least in my observances, people from the same area tend to think alike.
No electoral college=Californians, New Yorkers, and Texans choosing our leadership.
Do you see now how it CAN be advantageous to the nation?
Yeah, But you know what sucks about this. Is how Californians will know who is elected before we even close the polls.
They need to not let this information out untill all votes are counted. They said Al Gore won and people were turning away from the polls in California because they figured there was no point in voting. Then all of a sudden a reverse decision was made and I bet you anything had the announcment not been made that people in california who gave up may have in fact voted for Al Gore. Since California is a Democratic state now.