How would the image resolution of a 5d Mark II with PL mount prime lenses (ie. zeiss compact primes) compare to the resolution of an EX3 or HPX500 with pl mount lenses if the images were blown up to be screened in movie theaters.
The compression of the H.264 of the 5D/7D/T2i is so high that it's detrimental, but the lenses and size of the sensors is much better than the EX and others.
Why would the high compression be detrimental?
DSLRs have to compress because they are small and have limited processor power. Uncompressed footage would melt them. Even the larger Red has heat issues because the files it's puttting out are huge.
Why would the high compression be detrimental?