This was an interesting read. I'm not sure whether you've read our Community Ideas hub and so I'm not sure whether you intended this piece to fit with what we've been doing there. As a result it didn't really feel like it was constrained by the same self imposed regulations.
That's not to say I didn't like it, it was just interesting seeing a script on the same topic but done in a completely different way.
I wasn't sure about the conversation with the cashier. I'm not sure how naturalistically that would play out in conversation. I also didn't really understand the jokes in there, but that might just have been me being obtuse.
What I did like was the slow, practical poignancy. There wasn't any hysteria, it was just an acceptance that had already dawned, rather than a sudden realisation. In that sense it was quite similar to PTPs script on the same subject, which also dealt with characters who had spent years battling illness and could no longer get excited by such a slim chance of a cure...
I was a little confused by the news anchors, but that could just be because you were treating the subject very differently from how we are. What I didn't get was why they were being so cynical about the draw, especially on the news. 'Tickets' would only have been bought by people who desperately needed organ transplants, so would a news anchor really describe it as a 'surtax on desperation'? I'm not sure.
But overall I did enjoy the sombre tone of the piece and Deborah's complex relationship with her own illness...
