Documentary #1 titled "After Eric":
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dqhWP7J5-vw
Documentary #2 titled "Growing my Brave":
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ap0nJIGmSVw
I know framing, color correction/grading, lighting, audio, crew members skill, depth of field, camera movement/stabilization, and editing techniques can make a work look more high-quality/professional --but why do these two works with seemingly the same amount of effort put into them look so different? The one titled "After Eric" appears more defined and sharp as far as it's image --and seems higher in quality than the still fairly high quality "Growing my Brave" one. The "Growing my Brave" one was filmed with a Canon DSLR I believe, and the "After Eric" one was filmed with a Blackmagic Pocket Cinema Camera. What did the two production teams do differently? What makes them look different outside of what I mentioned? Which looks higher in quality/more professional to you? Am I over exaggerating regarding my opinion? Correct? Slightly correct?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dqhWP7J5-vw
Documentary #2 titled "Growing my Brave":
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ap0nJIGmSVw
I know framing, color correction/grading, lighting, audio, crew members skill, depth of field, camera movement/stabilization, and editing techniques can make a work look more high-quality/professional --but why do these two works with seemingly the same amount of effort put into them look so different? The one titled "After Eric" appears more defined and sharp as far as it's image --and seems higher in quality than the still fairly high quality "Growing my Brave" one. The "Growing my Brave" one was filmed with a Canon DSLR I believe, and the "After Eric" one was filmed with a Blackmagic Pocket Cinema Camera. What did the two production teams do differently? What makes them look different outside of what I mentioned? Which looks higher in quality/more professional to you? Am I over exaggerating regarding my opinion? Correct? Slightly correct?
Last edited: