Definitely, I'm just talking about image quality. To give you very high image quality at a low price a lot of compromises have been made in the hardware which can significantly impact usability and workflow. For a very low end production with far more time than money it's worth the trade off. For any production with a moderate budget the difference in cost isn't significant compared to the time (and thus money) you'll save in production and post using a camera that's designed with the needs of a professional crew and post workflow in mind. That's why the Alexa has turned out to be so popular for television production - Arri knows how to make a camera that not only has great picture quality, but also makes everyone's job easier (or at minimum, not harder). I'd say BM is at the opposite end of the spectrum, followed by Red, with Canon & Sony hitting the mid-range of pro-functionality vs. image quality vs. price.