Hey All,
I've lived in Texas all my life (25) and it's time for a change. There's a lot to love about Texas but, as soon I get the resources and take care of some unfinished business, I want to move to one of the coasts-somewhere I can walk along side an ocean that isn't the color of mud... I've visited both Florida (Jacksonville) & California (San Francisco, will be visiting Burbank soon), like them both, and am beginning to do research on jobs, cost of living, etc.
What do you think about my choices in terms of indy film production? My day job is in IT, but I want to write and direct a few more shorts and eventually give a serious go at an original feature. It's my understanding that if you want to be an actor or crew, L.A. is the place to go if you're really serious about it. Is it the same for independent writers and directors?
My perception is that everyone in L.A./California is trying to make it in the movies and everyone's trying to get money out of them. Plus, doesn't the state of California tax films and film-makers to $%&# and back? I imagine it's harder to put together a decent cast/crew and locations for little/no money, no? As an independent film maker, would I be better off going anywhere but California? Or is going to California worth it to make "connections"?
Your opinions would be appreciated, especially if you've had first hand experience living or working on films in either location.
I've lived in Texas all my life (25) and it's time for a change. There's a lot to love about Texas but, as soon I get the resources and take care of some unfinished business, I want to move to one of the coasts-somewhere I can walk along side an ocean that isn't the color of mud... I've visited both Florida (Jacksonville) & California (San Francisco, will be visiting Burbank soon), like them both, and am beginning to do research on jobs, cost of living, etc.
What do you think about my choices in terms of indy film production? My day job is in IT, but I want to write and direct a few more shorts and eventually give a serious go at an original feature. It's my understanding that if you want to be an actor or crew, L.A. is the place to go if you're really serious about it. Is it the same for independent writers and directors?
My perception is that everyone in L.A./California is trying to make it in the movies and everyone's trying to get money out of them. Plus, doesn't the state of California tax films and film-makers to $%&# and back? I imagine it's harder to put together a decent cast/crew and locations for little/no money, no? As an independent film maker, would I be better off going anywhere but California? Or is going to California worth it to make "connections"?
Your opinions would be appreciated, especially if you've had first hand experience living or working on films in either location.