Take this with a grain of salt as I am neither 1) A professional 2) A fan of random shorts that don't have a real story.
I assume the timeline follows what you state as taking the children to school, and I'll comment as such:
- I suggest shortening the intro, it looks like you have 2 with your production name, and 10 seconds is a really long time for an intro, especially on a 1:36 short.
- 0:18-0:20, he goes from asleep to immediately eyes open. Awakening is usually more of a transition unless one is harshly awoken IMO.
- 0:23-0:24, Framing could be higher up
- 0:42, was this deliberately out of focus?
- 0:49, framing is too low, IMO.
- 0:57, hard jump from inside to immediately outside, no transistion
- 1:06, no transition from outside to inside the car, just a jump
- Car driving part, I suggest including shots of the kids in the back seat to let us know they're still there
I know this was just a practice film, but it did look handheld for a lot of it. There were some good shots, but others looked like "camcorder" footage if you know what I mean. If you were shooting with DSLR (I'm thinking it wasn't), I'd suggest playing with a shallower depth of field if you have the capability, some shots would have benefited.
All in all, I see this film as what it is, practice. There are a few meaningful cuts, but unfortunately if you didn't explain in the description that the point was the person taking the children to school, I wouldn't have gotten that. I feel any short, even if just done for cinematic practice, should have SOME story, and it should speak for itself. That's just my 2 cents, but I'm more of a "Hollywood" style movie watcher, so I just don't get the cinematic for the sake of cinematic type films
Keep at it!