• Wondering which camera, gear, computer, or software to buy? Ask in our Gear Guide.

Need someone to have a look over my script for me...

Hello,

This is my first proper short film that i am looking to shoot in April. It is called "Only Human" and it is about a girl who forms a dangerous bond with one of her captors when her classroom is stormed, things get dangerous when the SAS get involved.

Please let me know what you think of the script.

P.S if there are any investors interested then i'm very happy to talk with you, I'm looking to get a budget of about £2,000.

One of these links should work, just let me know if they don't

https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B3q4KR8gFrNuMTcxZjVhYzAtZDAyNC00NjQ5LWI3NTAtYTE2ZjNiMjBiZGU2


https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&...ZDAyNC00NjQ5LWI3NTAtYTE2ZjNiMjBiZGU2&hl=en_US

Also feel free to follow the FB page for the film
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Only-H...57253074326627

Or follow me on twitter @S_BarrettFilms for updates on twitter

Thank you and i hope you enjoy the script.

NOTE: This is now an old script as new one is being written thanks to feedback, feel free to have a look though as it will still have the same general plot.
 
Last edited:
Thank you for informing me, I think there may be something wrong with my google docs or google docs in general as it says sharing is unavailable at the moment, so if anyone would like a copy of the script to look at leave your email address on here and I will email it to you, alternatively email me at s.barrett57@gmail.com and I will send it to you ASAP, thank you to anyone that takes the time to do this, you will all get a thanks in the credits.

Spencer
 
Sorry, but I just couldn’t get through it.

The only thing a writer has to communicate are words and the
standard grammar for writing. You do not use the standard
method of good communication. That makes reading your script
very, very difficult. I can’t tell if the plot is good or if the characters
are interesting because it was a struggle to read.

What I did get through I noticed you make the usual mistakes a
beginning screenwriter makes. Easy to fix. You do not write in the
present. You use a lot of “starting” - in a script people do not start
to do things; they do them. You tell us things rather than showing
them on the screen.

Give it another pass. Read a few screenplay to get the hang of
screenplay writing. The dialogue was good - your entire script deserves
better.
 
Sorry, but I just couldn’t get through it.

The only thing a writer has to communicate are words and the
standard grammar for writing. You do not use the standard
method of good communication. That makes reading your script
very, very difficult. I can’t tell if the plot is good or if the characters
are interesting because it was a struggle to read.

What I did get through I noticed you make the usual mistakes a
beginning screenwriter makes. Easy to fix. You do not write in the
present. You use a lot of “starting” - in a script people do not start
to do things; they do them. You tell us things rather than showing
them on the screen.

Give it another pass. Read a few screenplay to get the hang of
screenplay writing. The dialogue was good - your entire script deserves
better.

thank you, I think that I do get a bit carried away when I get in to the flow of writing so grammar sometimes passes me by. As for how I wrote, I'll read through a few scripts and then go through mine again. I'll maybe send it to you after and hopefully it will be easier to read. Thanks again :)
 
As others have already pointed out, there are lots of technical flaws--some small, some glaring. I won't comment on those except to agree with Directorik and also suggest obtaining a good book on screenwriting.

I will discuss your plot and dialogue. What I'm going to say is not meant to hurt or insult your work. I know how much time and effort you have put into this. Since you want to film this, my feedback is meant to help you strengthen your film.

My first read was that this was a bland script with rather flat dialogue and action. The script does not help to explain what is happening or why. It feels more as if I was dropped into the middle of a feature to watch a short segment, rather than a complete short in itself. The beginning is confusing, the middle is muddled, and the end is unfulfilling.

You drop us into the first scene without any introduction to the characters. Key to any short or movies are the characters; the audience has to have a connection to want to follow their story. You don't. You jump straight into action without any introduction or preparation.

Who is the tutor? Male or female? Twenties? Forties? For me a tutor doesn't have a classroom of students while a teacher would. So it confused me as a reader. Also, how old are Charlie and Katie? How old are the terrorists? This dynamic plays out in your movie because a 13 year old girl falling for a 28 year old terrorist is different from an 18 y.o. girl falling for a 22 y.o. terrorist. Again, none of that is shown in your script.

Why is the tutor easy on Katie? Why is she fragile at this time? It made no sense. Why would the terrorists target that school or that classroom? These kind of gaping holes really hinder your storyline. Some students? How many? What happens to the tutor who is never mentioned again? Why shoot Charlie and not the tutor?

Timing. How did the SAS find out so quickly? And why would the police become involved (Alan) before the SAS? These issues alone cause the reader/viewer to roll their eyes. Perhaps have the terrorists send the tutor out with a list of their demands while they keep the kids hostage. And how did the scene jump to a house? Maybe just keep it as the situation room.

A young girl is shot and you end with a shot of the SAS head lighting up a cigarette? Really? That last dialogue between Daveys and Henderson is unrealistic. And because of the rather sparse buildup, it comes across as flat. If you want it to be meaningful, you need to take time to develop the audience's concern for your characters Davies, Katie, Rafiq, and the others. We should be shocked when Charlie is shot but instead it's more of "Oh, he's the expendable character."

This is pretty much an afternoon shoot with AfterEffects gun effects. Certainly it can be done for free or at least considerably less than even 50 pounds. As you've written it, this is a micro budget production.

Again, these comments are not meant to demean your work. Please understand that these are the continuity and story issues that make the difference when creating a quality short. The film must have a believable story with characters the audience can care about. If you resolve some of these issues mentioned above and correct the script as suggested by Directorik and others, you should have a shootable script by Spring of next year.
 
I think that I do get a bit carried away when I get in to the flow of writing so grammar sometimes passes me by.
An excellent lesson learned.

You should see my first couple of drafts. Well, you shouldn't - my
first drafts are terrible. I can't spell and my grammar isn't very
good. What I do not do is show that draft to anyone. I take the
time to correct it and make sure it is presentable. That way people
can concentrate on the script and not my horrible presentation
of the script.

For the record: I had to spell check this message and there were
four misspelled words and seven typos.
 
As others have already pointed out, there are lots of technical flaws--some small, some glaring. I won't comment on those except to agree with Directorik and also suggest obtaining a good book on screenwriting.

I will discuss your plot and dialogue. What I'm going to say is not meant to hurt or insult your work. I know how much time and effort you have put into this. Since you want to film this, my feedback is meant to help you strengthen your film.

My first read was that this was a bland script with rather flat dialogue and action. The script does not help to explain what is happening or why. It feels more as if I was dropped into the middle of a feature to watch a short segment, rather than a complete short in itself. The beginning is confusing, the middle is muddled, and the end is unfulfilling.

You drop us into the first scene without any introduction to the characters. Key to any short or movies are the characters; the audience has to have a connection to want to follow their story. You don't. You jump straight into action without any introduction or preparation.

Who is the tutor? Male or female? Twenties? Forties? For me a tutor doesn't have a classroom of students while a teacher would. So it confused me as a reader. Also, how old are Charlie and Katie? How old are the terrorists? This dynamic plays out in your movie because a 13 year old girl falling for a 28 year old terrorist is different from an 18 y.o. girl falling for a 22 y.o. terrorist. Again, none of that is shown in your script.

Why is the tutor easy on Katie? Why is she fragile at this time? It made no sense. Why would the terrorists target that school or that classroom? These kind of gaping holes really hinder your storyline. Some students? How many? What happens to the tutor who is never mentioned again? Why shoot Charlie and not the tutor?

Timing. How did the SAS find out so quickly? And why would the police become involved (Alan) before the SAS? These issues alone cause the reader/viewer to roll their eyes. Perhaps have the terrorists send the tutor out with a list of their demands while they keep the kids hostage. And how did the scene jump to a house? Maybe just keep it as the situation room.

A young girl is shot and you end with a shot of the SAS head lighting up a cigarette? Really? That last dialogue between Daveys and Henderson is unrealistic. And because of the rather sparse buildup, it comes across as flat. If you want it to be meaningful, you need to take time to develop the audience's concern for your characters Davies, Katie, Rafiq, and the others. We should be shocked when Charlie is shot but instead it's more of "Oh, he's the expendable character."

This is pretty much an afternoon shoot with AfterEffects gun effects. Certainly it can be done for free or at least considerably less than even 50 pounds. As you've written it, this is a micro budget production.

Again, these comments are not meant to demean your work. Please understand that these are the continuity and story issues that make the difference when creating a quality short. The film must have a believable story with characters the audience can care about. If you resolve some of these issues mentioned above and correct the script as suggested by Directorik and others, you should have a shootable script by Spring of next year.

Blimey, where do i start with this? :)

At first i'll admit, i dead read your comment with a certain amount of dread, but after a few moments thought i realised that what you said was extremely helpful to me. Most of the things you have said i agree with wholeheartedly, some things i do not so much. The budget is high because i have seen the cost of things needed to make the film to it's full potential. Things like Gas masks, military boots, SAS outfits, guns etc all have to be taken in to consideration, which is fairly costly.

That being said, your comments about the script were spot on, some of the things i left out on purpose (with out thinking) such as the details about the characters, this was to give myself a lot of flexibility when finding actors etc. Though looking back now, i should have put it all in regardless.

The ending i agree, is absolutely pitiful, i basically ran out of ideas and had no other way to end it, though thanks to your other comments i now have an idea for a start which also gave me a decent way to end it. I think i will start with each significant character starting their day ( Terrorists planning, Katy going to school, Tutor going to school etc) this will also give me a way to end it as i will show how each household reacts to the bad news (with the exception of the terrorists obviously)

The house is like a snipers nest, SAS always try to get their own eyes in on the situation, i think this is a useful part of the script so i may still keep it.

As for the police finding out, i will possibly use the idea of the tutor being sent out, i also like the idea of the tutor getting shot, also involving him more throughout the script.

All in all, thank you, you have saved me a lot of disappointment, if i had made it then all of this came out i would have been gutted, i am very glad that it happened before.

Thank you

P.S also a thank you to you Directorik, i will keep it all in mind :)
 
I really do appreciate how much effort goes into writing, so my comments are sincerely meant to help you re-write the script. If there is anything which I would strongly focus on its your characters. Audiences will overlook costumes and locations but the characters are the meat of your movie.

The hardest part of filming your own movie is that you have the movie playing in your head while you are writing it. That works well for some. For others, the mental image is more vivid and the script is quite sparse. The trick is transcribing what's in your head into the script. Remember this is the first draft. A good script will go through many revisions. And even when being shot, it will be revised by necessity. The clearer the vision on paper, the easier it is track.

Others forums here might be a good place to find ways of cutting down prop and costume costs. Unless you intend to reuse them, it makes more sense to lease, borrow, or share because ownership will involve storage. But my point was that for a 10 minute short (1 page ~ 1 minute), 2000 pounds sounds a bit high. If you were shooting a 30 minute webisode or festival entry, I'd be more inclined to agree.

My point about the recon house is that it appears only twice each with only a one line delivery. Maybe 8 seconds of screen time. It's a lot of set up for something that is so trivial. One has to ask how much does it really add to the movie?

Code:
INT. HOUSE DAY

The sniper team observe the shooting, GRIFFIN slams his fist
down on the table, angry that they can not do anything, he
picks up his radio and radios in.

                   GRIFFIN
       Sergeant the situation has got
       worse.

[CUT TO CLASSROOM]
They could observe the scene from outside the school. Griffin could respond equally well from the situation room. Nothing about this scene requires it to be in the house.

Part of writing is making the scenes relevant and cost effective. I constantly have to think is this scene really necessary? A director/producer needs to think cost and bang-for-the-buck. On a microbudget, you can shoot this in your own house or flat. If you had to pay for a site, you might think that 8 second shot isn't worth the expense. Trust me, these are lessons that we all learn. I had a director tell me to change a location because it is too expensive to shoot. (I had to cut a whole scene and re-write parts of the script to accommodate the change--draft 6, revision 4! ugh!)

As an aside, your script would benefit from being broken into visual shots.
Code:
INT. HOUSE DAY

Griffin stands at the window with binoculars to his eyes.

A gunshot rings out.

He lowers them as his eyes close and his face grimaces.
He slams his fist down on the table before picking up the
radio mouth piece.

                   GRIFFIN
             (to handset)
       Sergeant, we have a casualty.
In contrasting the two, you need to show that he's angry and frustrated, not tell us. The audience can't see that. These are separated as distinct shots or descriptions. As a director, I can see in my mind a close up shot of Griffin. Hear the gunshot. Then a medium shot where he reacts to what he's seen. The director can tell the other actors how they should respond in the background. I also changed it to "we have a casualty". They've had a 'situation' and it 'got worse' doesn't really convey anything. If I had Charlie and the tutor being threatened before I cut to this scene, there is some ambiguity as to who was shot. It might have even been a terrorist or another student. Then when we switch back to the classroom, we learn it was Charlie. Part of the drama is not laying out all the cards immediately.

The first draft is to get the concept on paper. Then comes the hard part of being ruthless in your revision--do I need this scene? this character? Would they really talk that way? that long? Should something be happening now? The secret to writing is re-writing. The shorter your film, the easier it is to shoot when you have few locations.

As a writer, I always describe my main characters. It lets the person reading my script know how I see them and conveys how they will act. Typically the director and casting director will see a different person or have an actor under contract who must fill the role. But for me, as a writer, it helps provide a continuity. The amount of description is dependent on their importance to the story. Again, the script is a blueprint. It can be changed after the fact, but you need to be clear with your vision when you first start. A clear character description helps your actors. It helps to know who is older/experienced or young/naive. Who is strong/defiant and vulnerable/submissive. These are developed by description, action, and dialogue.

Don't just say someone is a scumbag, show it. Currently the terrorists basically stand around waiting. That doesn't sound very clever or intentional. They targeted the school and this class intentionally--why? As a writer you need to help the audience piece together why. Is Katie's mom/dad a high level operative? Did s/he go missing? Is that why she's fragile? You want to have your characters' lives present your story.

Thinking through the timing is critical. The SAS couldn't know this was happening in advance or they would have stopped it. Have the terrorists send the tutor out with demands. This brings in the police (Alan). In turn, the police pull in the SAS. Now the SAS can be more fully active. Or if you want to play that the SAS were in the know, then make the tutor an SAS plant and play with that a bit. You need to have a way for the police to become involved. At the moment your story starts no one could possibly know that the classroom has been taken. You tip your hand by starting with the SAS. It would be more powerful to have Henderson alerted and demand information about these three terrorists after the fact. Maybe another teacher enters unaware and is told to evacuate the school. Or maybe have the terrorists pull the fire alarm. The timing needs to seem realistic. Ask yourself "How would someone know about this? Then what?" The more reality-based your movie, the more credible it has to be.

It may sound like a lot of work, and it can be. However, for a short, the emotional drama could all play out in the classroom with brief cameos in the situation room if you want. Two locations help focus development and provide the build up, drama, and resolution.

In the end film the classroom being gassed. You need only a few standard military costumes and one gas mask. The power of your story will be in the portrayal. And rather than make the terrorists the bad guys--a rather flat portrayal--introduce their lives. Why would they resort to storming a classroom? This is the difference between 2D and 3D characters. Most new writers develop their heroes but not their villains to their detriment. Just as you play with lighting and sound to bring out the visual and mood elements of a scene, use your action, description and dialogue to bring out the nuances of your characters.

Again, I am not saying your work is horrid or you are a bad writer. These are areas which we all stumble against. Thank you for taking my comments as they are intended--to help enhance your effort. With thought and effort, I think you can have an excellent short. Good luck with your shoot.
 
I really do appreciate how much effort goes into writing, so my comments are sincerely meant to help you re-write the script. If there is anything which I would strongly focus on its your characters. Audiences will overlook costumes and locations but the characters are the meat of your movie.

The hardest part of filming your own movie is that you have the movie playing in your head while you are writing it. That works well for some. For others, the mental image is more vivid and the script is quite sparse. The trick is transcribing what's in your head into the script. Remember this is the first draft. A good script will go through many revisions. And even when being shot, it will be revised by necessity. The clearer the vision on paper, the easier it is track.

Others forums here might be a good place to find ways of cutting down prop and costume costs. Unless you intend to reuse them, it makes more sense to lease, borrow, or share because ownership will involve storage. But my point was that for a 10 minute short (1 page ~ 1 minute), 2000 pounds sounds a bit high. If you were shooting a 30 minute webisode or festival entry, I'd be more inclined to agree.

My point about the recon house is that it appears only twice each with only a one line delivery. Maybe 8 seconds of screen time. It's a lot of set up for something that is so trivial. One has to ask how much does it really add to the movie?

Code:
INT. HOUSE DAY

The sniper team observe the shooting, GRIFFIN slams his fist
down on the table, angry that they can not do anything, he
picks up his radio and radios in.

                   GRIFFIN
       Sergeant the situation has got
       worse.

[CUT TO CLASSROOM]
They could observe the scene from outside the school. Griffin could respond equally well from the situation room. Nothing about this scene requires it to be in the house.

Part of writing is making the scenes relevant and cost effective. I constantly have to think is this scene really necessary? A director/producer needs to think cost and bang-for-the-buck. On a microbudget, you can shoot this in your own house or flat. If you had to pay for a site, you might think that 8 second shot isn't worth the expense. Trust me, these are lessons that we all learn. I had a director tell me to change a location because it is too expensive to shoot. (I had to cut a whole scene and re-write parts of the script to accommodate the change--draft 6, revision 4! ugh!)

As an aside, your script would benefit from being broken into visual shots.
Code:
INT. HOUSE DAY

Griffin stands at the window with binoculars to his eyes.

A gunshot rings out.

He lowers them as his eyes close and his face grimaces.
He slams his fist down on the table before picking up the
radio mouth piece.

                   GRIFFIN
             (to handset)
       Sergeant, we have a casualty.
In contrasting the two, you need to show that he's angry and frustrated, not tell us. The audience can't see that. These are separated as distinct shots or descriptions. As a director, I can see in my mind a close up shot of Griffin. Hear the gunshot. Then a medium shot where he reacts to what he's seen. The director can tell the other actors how they should respond in the background. I also changed it to "we have a casualty". They've had a 'situation' and it 'got worse' doesn't really convey anything. If I had Charlie and the tutor being threatened before I cut to this scene, there is some ambiguity as to who was shot. It might have even been a terrorist or another student. Then when we switch back to the classroom, we learn it was Charlie. Part of the drama is not laying out all the cards immediately.

The first draft is to get the concept on paper. Then comes the hard part of being ruthless in your revision--do I need this scene? this character? Would they really talk that way? that long? Should something be happening now? The secret to writing is re-writing. The shorter your film, the easier it is to shoot when you have few locations.

As a writer, I always describe my main characters. It lets the person reading my script know how I see them and conveys how they will act. Typically the director and casting director will see a different person or have an actor under contract who must fill the role. But for me, as a writer, it helps provide a continuity. The amount of description is dependent on their importance to the story. Again, the script is a blueprint. It can be changed after the fact, but you need to be clear with your vision when you first start. A clear character description helps your actors. It helps to know who is older/experienced or young/naive. Who is strong/defiant and vulnerable/submissive. These are developed by description, action, and dialogue.

Don't just say someone is a scumbag, show it. Currently the terrorists basically stand around waiting. That doesn't sound very clever or intentional. They targeted the school and this class intentionally--why? As a writer you need to help the audience piece together why. Is Katie's mom/dad a high level operative? Did s/he go missing? Is that why she's fragile? You want to have your characters' lives present your story.

Thinking through the timing is critical. The SAS couldn't know this was happening in advance or they would have stopped it. Have the terrorists send the tutor out with demands. This brings in the police (Alan). In turn, the police pull in the SAS. Now the SAS can be more fully active. Or if you want to play that the SAS were in the know, then make the tutor an SAS plant and play with that a bit. You need to have a way for the police to become involved. At the moment your story starts no one could possibly know that the classroom has been taken. You tip your hand by starting with the SAS. It would be more powerful to have Henderson alerted and demand information about these three terrorists after the fact. Maybe another teacher enters unaware and is told to evacuate the school. Or maybe have the terrorists pull the fire alarm. The timing needs to seem realistic. Ask yourself "How would someone know about this? Then what?" The more reality-based your movie, the more credible it has to be.

It may sound like a lot of work, and it can be. However, for a short, the emotional drama could all play out in the classroom with brief cameos in the situation room if you want. Two locations help focus development and provide the build up, drama, and resolution.

In the end film the classroom being gassed. You need only a few standard military costumes and one gas mask. The power of your story will be in the portrayal. And rather than make the terrorists the bad guys--a rather flat portrayal--introduce their lives. Why would they resort to storming a classroom? This is the difference between 2D and 3D characters. Most new writers develop their heroes but not their villains to their detriment. Just as you play with lighting and sound to bring out the visual and mood elements of a scene, use your action, description and dialogue to bring out the nuances of your characters.

Again, I am not saying your work is horrid or you are a bad writer. These are areas which we all stumble against. Thank you for taking my comments as they are intended--to help enhance your effort. With thought and effort, I think you can have an excellent short. Good luck with your shoot.

Once again, i have to thank you, another amazing post :) These are really helping me out, so thank you :)

I should have been a bit more clear for my intentions with the film, I do intend to go to film festivals with it, i have 2 main ones in mind that will be open when i finish with it; The Raindance short film festival and the London Short Film Festival.

As for the script i am currently re-writing it, the characters now all have an introduction and a proper ending. The tutor (now called James) Does take the note out and return, on the premise that if he takes longer than 5 minutes everyone in the class dies. I will try to add more to the terrorists backgrounds.

The snipers house could be taken out, though then to keep it accurate i would need Ghille suits, though i may be able to borrow a couple from some friends. I think it may be better for the script in general. I might also go with your idea of Griffin reacting to the shooting, though part of me feels that some of the shock factor comes with seeing the shooting happen. I will think about it some more and no doubt i will be going through the script many times again before i decide.

As for what i have seen with hostage situations involving the SAS they are normally on standby from the go as soon as a hostage situation is discovered. They normally go through many ways of planning which i will not show as it's not a documentary on the SAS so i don't want to bore people with them going through huge amounts of planning.

I will revise the script this time and see what i come up with, if you would like to have a look at the revised version then i'd be more than happy to send it along to you as your comments on it have saved me a lot of pain in the long run.

Thank you again

Spencer
 
Back
Top