rizien said:One thing you're not thinking about gay marriage is that if we compromise with one fetish/disorder, then we're gonna ahve to compromise with all of them. You gonna fight for a man's right to marry his horse?
I could care less if you're gay, i could care less if you act on it, i could care less if you live together your whole life as if you're married. But if we let that disorder get married, then we'll have to let them all...
I disagree, but see where you're coming from (something you seem to never say ). Even if you consider homosexuality as a fetish/disorder...it is victimless. I feel that gays getting married would affect NO ONE except gays. I just can't see how it would affect society negatively. Gay's are gay...some or most of them will ALWAYS be gay no matter what...so they might as well be able to marry if they want....If that leads to "wierder" things that we are not ready for right now...I don't care...as long as it doesn't affect society (or horses) negatively. That's the whole point of laws. I think a healthy compromise would be letting the states decide rather than constitutionally banning it.
I think my first sentance is one that you may want to think about...I don't want to preach at you, but just try to be empathetic to other views of the world. Socialism has been proven a failure over and over throughout history, but some people don't know all that. In the real world it won't work, but on paper socialism looks good...that's why people drift toward it.
Last edited: