Oh my gosh. Hell, the narrator made me laugh out loud at first, and then the rest continued to amuse me. I can see why people might not want to touch it. And let's face it: it is pretty much untouchable, isn't it? But that doesn't change the fact that it's clever and pretty funny. It's just black humor.
However, the world and people being what they are, my fear would be that if you actually made such a film and exhibited it on YouTube, or whatever, you might end up having to lawyer up.
There was that lawsuit years ago against Judas Priest.
From Wikipedia:
In the summer of 1990, the band was involved in a civil action that alleged they were responsible for the self-inflicted gunshot wounds in 1985 of 20-year-old James Vance and 18-year-old Raymond Belknap in Sparks, Nevada, USA.[25] On 23 December 1985, Vance and Belknap, after hours of drinking beer, smoking marijuana and allegedly listening to Judas Priest, went to a playground at a church in Sparks with a 12-gauge shotgun to end their lives. Belknap was the first to place the shotgun under his chin. He died instantly after pulling the trigger. Vance then shot himself but survived, suffering severe facial injuries. Following numerous complications, Vance too passed away in 1988, three years after the suicide pact.[6]
The men's parents and their legal team alleged that a subliminal message of "do it" had been included in the Judas Priest song "Better By You, Better Than Me" (a cover of the Spooky Tooth number) from the Stained Class (197

album. They alleged the command in the song triggered the suicide attempt.[25] The trial lasted from 16 July to 24 August 1990, when the suit was dismissed after the judge ruled that the so-called "do it" message was a result of an accidental mix up of background lyrics.[25] One of the defence witnesses, Dr. Timothy E. Moore, wrote an article for Skeptical Inquirer chronicling the trial.[25] The trial was covered in the 1991 documentary Dream Deceivers: The Story Behind James Vance Vs. Judas Priest.
Thankfully, the judge dismissed it. But, I wonder...
It's not like I have a clue if you would actually be vulnerable to such legal problems. I am not a lawyer, and I am not well informed!
But I would be surprised if that wasn't a danger.
Then, unfortunately, we probably do need to consider our moral responsibilities with something like this.
Might it encourage someone to harm themselves? And yes, it may be hurtful to those who have been touched by
. I'm not necessarily saying things like this shouldn't be written, spoken, sung, filmed, etc. I'm only saying that sometimes self-censorship might be for the best or prudent, as much as I loathe censorship. It's just something that thoughtful artists who have a conscience have to struggle with, consider, and weigh. I don't know the correct answer.
Anyway. Don't let the negativity of others drag you down, generally speaking. Sometimes others are right about our ideas or products having problems or not being good. Sure. But your script is good! I think. It's quite clever. But, apart from quality, it has other obvious...
challenges going for it.
And sometimes it's our family and friends who are the most discouraging or negative about our aspirations.
But in this case, they're probably not being negative about your writing or storytelling itself, per se, or your dismissing your skillfulness. They're probably responding to the troubling subject matter and message.
If you don't pursue that would-be film, and I am not saying that you shouldn't or should, one way or the other, I'm not too worried about you. Because if you can come with such a clever idea and write such a clever script, I'll bet you can come up with others...and maybe some that are less fraught with..."thematic difficulties."